Talk:Alcohol prohibition in India

Misleading Article Name

Why is this article name is "Prohibition in India". It seems this is a general article on prohibition in India and all we talk is about alcohol prohibition. I think this article need to be renamed Alcohol Prohibition in India or atleast a non-comprehensive article notice should be put. Civilinformer (talk) 12:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

You are absolutely right. I am moving the page. Chhandama (talk) 13:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

I have created a research page for linking to sources for the article here: Talk:Prohibition in Gujarat/Research. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 17:56, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, and elsewhere. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alcohol prohibition in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807233919/http://ksbc.kerala.gov.in:80/know.htm to http://www.ksbc.kerala.gov.in/know.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alcohol prohibition in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141115220135/http://www.cghearthhotels.com/bangaram-island-resort.html to http://www.cghearthhotels.com/bangaram-island-resort.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928122008/http://www.ucanews.com/2010/08/31/alcohol-prohibition-to-remain-in-nagaland/ to http://www.ucanews.com/2010/08/31/alcohol-prohibition-to-remain-in-nagaland/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ksbc.kerala.gov.in/know.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

"LEAKER BAN" -("ALCOHOL")

It is best action taken by the government of 'bihar' , 'Gujrat' , 'Mizoram' and 'Nagaland' as well as in union territory 'Lakshadweep', expect these all other Indian states and union territory permit the sale of "ALCOHOL". Leaker ban is also a constitution Article 47. ĎÎVŸÃŃŚHŪ ŘÂJPÛŤ (ČHÀÙHÁÑ) (talk) 10:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Bihar Source Quality

Was wondering if someone else would take a look at the Bihar prohibition effects section, which reads to me as slanted towards prohibition, and see what they think. The section asserts that everything from crime rates to brick house construction has been improved by the law (statements that are all drawn from the same NYT article source), but the origin of those stats isn't reported in the source. I'm curious as to whether they're coming from an advocacy group or are truly impartial facts. Thanks! Tadzweil (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)