Talk:Alcobaça Formation

File:Ceratosaurus nasicornis DB.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ceratosaurus nasicornis DB.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:41, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I propose that this page be merged with Camadas de Guimarota, as it is simply a WP:CONTENTFORK of this article. According to the article itself, the Alcobaça Formation was originally called the Guimarota Formation. I'm pretty sure "Camadas de Guimarota" is simply the Portuguese name for the Guimarota Formation, so I believe there should be no reason to have two different articles for the same unit. Miracusaurs (talk) 09:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

It looks like the Camadas de Guimarota refers to an old coal mine notable only for its paleontology. If that's the case, I wonder if the merger shojld go the other way -- from the mine to the formation article, with its infobox and other detailed information. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, the Camadas de Guimarota is a defunct coal mine with little significance beyond its paleontology I agree with a reverse merge i.e. Merging the mine into the formation. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)