I understand the instinct of User:Piotrus to place a notability prod tag on this article, but if one looks at the archived Gale Directory of Company Histories entry for this company (under a later name) and scroll down to the bottom where the "Further reading" section is, one finds entries for an article on this agency in Barrons and Business Week (clear by the titles) and likely ones in Forbes and Money (the title is unclear). So while this article doesn't currently use those sources and I have not read those articles themselves, their existence suggests a strong likelihood that this subject meets our notability guidelines. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
- @NatGertler: Hmmm, those two articles (Barron's, BW) seem to be enough for notability, through would be good to verify their actual existence. Also, here's a mirror (source?) for the page you found that is live: [1]. For now, I'll add those two to the article further reading, I think we can leave this be. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
