Talk:Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as a foreign language article that exists on another Wikimedia project, because it is an English translation that has been incorrectly tagged. --Mauls (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

To add, this is blatantly not foreign language. It is an English translation of a notable subject, the French computer security agency. Mauls (talk) 21:58, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030170607/http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/fr/anssi/presentation/l-historique-de-l-anssi.html to http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/fr/anssi/presentation/l-historique-de-l-anssi.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150718164637/http://www.ssi.gouv.fr:80/administration/formations/presentation/ to http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/administration/formations/presentation/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151001062949/http://www.ssi.gouv.fr:80/agence/cybersecurite/comite-strategique/ to http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/agence/cybersecurite/comite-strategique/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313082103/http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Discours_Patrick_Pailloux-_Assises_2012.pdf to http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Discours_Patrick_Pailloux-_Assises_2012.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --107.242.125.18 (talk) 07:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Started Activities section and moved Macron email leaks there

Hello, I just moved information pertaining to the Macron email leaks from the lead to a newly created Activities section. I did this because the information seems too specific for the lead. Having an Activities section may also facilitate the addition of any other significant investigations by ANSSI.

I also amended parts of the sentences related to the Macron email leaks. I have listed all of them below.

1. The sentences previously stated that the presidential election took place in 2016, but it really occurred in 2017. Changing it to 2017 also brings it in line with the date of the quote.
2. Since some readers may not be as familiar with Le Monde or En Marche ! , I added "newspaper" and "political party", respectively, to clarify what those entities are. My second motivation for adding "political party" is to increase transparency on the origin of the statement put out by En Marche ! since that appears to toe the line concerning neutrality, in my humble opinion.
3. I streamlined the citation format
4. I added a sentence to give a little more info about ANSSI's role following the breach.

Lastly, I left the verb tense for the Macron email leak paragraph as it was originally written, but I think there may be a better way to phrase the first sentence. Unfortunately, the Le Monde article cited requires a subscription, which I don't have, so I haven't been able to check what the article had said. Perhaps if someone has a subscription, they can help clarify what that first sentence means.

If there's any disagreement on the edit, please feel free to start a discussion! --GlossomathisRabbit (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)