Talk:Agacheri

Latest comment: 1 day ago by IntentionallyDense in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Agacheri/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Aintabli (talk · contribs) 02:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 05:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)Reply


I will review this shortly. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 05:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Noted some prose issues below. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. MOS is complied with. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). I spot-checked both sources and found no issues. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  2c. it contains no original research. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Left some suggestions regarding further sources to incorporate and areas where information may be missing. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). No unnecessary details. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. unbiased. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. N/A IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. N/A IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 03:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall assessment. On hold until Aintabli addresses my comments thus far. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply