Talk:Adverse inference
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on September 27, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
VfD Sept 2007
editQuestions on notability were raised via [1]. Please review that if you have notability questions. Yes, it appears adverse inference has played a definitive role in major, recent court actions. It is an "extreme sanction" which "often terminates the litigation". NuclearWinner 17:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Remove Primary Sources tag
editIn view of WP:COMMON , I have removed the primary sources tag upon the reasoning that using a court's own opinion is the best approach in view of common sense. Also, the court's opinions are not "original research" but rather are merely direct quotes which are indisputable and are quite definitive and binding precedent upon the subject matter. This is because of the fact that the various reporters are not the primary source, but rather the court is the primary source and t he various reporters in the references are a secondary source. 24.155.244.245 (talk) 23:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)