Talk:Adam W. Oberlin
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cielquiparle in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Adam W. Oberlin appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 14:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
( )
.png)
Adam W. Oberlin
- ... that Adam W. Oberlin (pictured), 1917 Republican nominee for mayor of Canton, Ohio, went missing and was found seven months later working as a carpenter in Norfolk, Virginia? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-virginian-pilot-ohio-senator-working/129737397/
- Reviewed:
Created by Engineerchange (talk). Self-nominated at 01:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Adam W. Oberlin; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Article is long enough and new enough; no sourcing, copyright, or content issues were found. Hook meets length and format criterion; hook source identified above covers all facts except Republican connection which I found in another source used in the article so hook is good to go. Image was originally published in 1918 so it is in Public Domain; rollover tag is done. QPQ review is still pending.--Orygun (talk) 04:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)- Comment: This is my second DYK nom, so I believe I am not required to do a QPQ this time: QPQ check --Engineerchange (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
If this is your second DYK nomination, I'm pretty sure QPQ review isn't required... so DYK should be good to go.--Orygun (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
