Talk:Adam Foulds

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability

edit

I found it extraordinary that a page, clearly referenced, on a published author who is the winner of one award and current contender for another award, both of which are notable enough to have their own WP pages, should have been marked for deletion. almost-instinct 09:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

This was precisely my rationale for adding this person, so thank you, almost-instinct. As the media coverage cited in the article makes clear, Foulds is in fact a very notable literary talent, and the page was created to reflect the continuing interest of prize judges in his writings. It seems extraordinary to me that it was marked for deletion. Macphysto (talk) 10:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Foulds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply