Greater Acworth

edit

The paragraph on postal areas was removed. It could have been written differently perhaps. While it may seem presumptious, you might want to define a "greater Acworth" which would include postal areas and suburbs not actually within the city limits. All vibrant towns/cities run into the same problem. You have to carefully draw the line on census figures and government but, with care, can still include others who are by zip code, or other reason, considered part of the town or city.Student7 17:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Acworth, Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Acworth, Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Rake Law

edit

A blurb in the Government section discusses a law that required citizens to own a rake, similar to nearby Kennesaw's ordinance that citizens own a gun. However, the sources cited are a user contribution on a trivia cite, and the current municipal code to show that the law no longer exists. I can't find any reference to the law anywhere online except for lists of unusual laws. I suspect this may be a hoax, but I will further research the issue this summer when I am in the area and can see if I can find the documents from the era. TheMrP (talk) 06:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply