Talk:Acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle Corporation
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Counterpoint?
editOk I know this article is currently a bunch of doomsaying against Oracle. Honestly I tried to find some opposing points of view out there. But at first look it's not really there. And I'm tired after going through the list of bad things that actually have happened.
I really do want this to be a balanced article. Has anyone read any good stories or views that've come out of this? Positive things that've happened? (Not just predictions from beforehand.) Maybe advantages for customers or projects actually that have thrived?
--Qwerty0 (talk) 12:35, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- There is no counterpoint. Oracle jumped the shark, repeatedly, in the dumbest way possible. Wish there was something positive to say! --Demonkoryu (talk) 10:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Sun acquisition by Oracle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090801043420/http://www.itworld.com:80/business/72663/suns-jruby-team-jumps-ship-engine-yard to http://www.itworld.com/business/72663/suns-jruby-team-jumps-ship-engine-yard
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)