Talk:A v Hoare
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Iorworth Hoare was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 12 December 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A v Hoare. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Intro
editHi, this is the first legal entry that I've written, the only reason I've done so is that it was red-texted on List Cases UKHL and I'm familiar with the case. I've mainly focussed on the s33 discretionary power and its relevance when looking at s11. There are other concerns in the case, in fact the case was six conjoined appeals, but this is the main point of law and I think the most relevant. Source links are all attached so if anyone wants to get more in depth they can but this seemed about right for wiki. --J mortimer (talk) 21:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A v Hoare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421162937/http://www.lawcom.gov.uk:80/limitation_actions_summary.htm to http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/limitation_actions_summary.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)