Talk:A Ring of Endless Light
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled
editOkay, I added the infobox. Would it be desirable for me to upload the cover art from the hardback addition to replace the paperback art? Maybe I should ask on the Novels project page. Karen | Talk | contribs 05:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Ring of endless light.jpg
edit
Image:Ring of endless light.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I took out the sentence "The whole philosophical magic is completely missing from the movie." from the last section. This is not a substantiated fact but a subjective claim without any references or any support. One might say, "many people felt that the philosophical magic was missing from the movie," and then provide references proving this statement, but to just state it plainly as the "opinion" of wikipedia is not okay. Also, it is unclear as to what the phrase "philosophical magic" means. Perhaps philosophical complexity is meant, but philosophical magic does not seem like a good phrase to be using on a wikipedia article.
