Talk:ADtranz DE-AC33C

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comments

edit

Some info from de:wikipedia used, but mostly not.

More info on Pakistani locos please.. (references) 213.249.232.187 (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Numbers

edit

What is number range of Pakistan locos. It includes 6004.

Tabletop (talk) 01:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Egypt

edit

http://www.railfaneurope.net/list/egypt/egypt_er.html says locos went to egypt - is this confirmable/reliable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.68.226 (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Henschel built locomotives for Egypt with a similar body but powered by EMD. --Tobias b köhler (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ADtranz DE-AC33C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply