Talk:A9 dualling project/GA1

Latest comment: 2 days ago by BigChrisKenney in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: JuniperChill (talk · contribs) 16:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 07:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply


Hello, @JuniperChill: I will be reviewing this article for the January 2025 Backlog Drive. This is an ongoing project so I hope that future edits will match the quality of a GA. BigChrisKenney (talk) 07:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Initial Assesment

edit

Intro

edit

Added a comma you may wish to review.

History

edit

Early upgrades

edit

I removed the conversion template as it was causing 'mile' to change to 'miles' which would have been incorrect.

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Speed cameras

edit

Good!

Road saftey statistics

edit

Good!

Construction

edit

Announcement

edit

Good!

Completed section (2015-2021)

edit

Removed the conversion template. I made some edits you may wish to review.

Proposed sections

edit

I made a few edits you may wish to review.

Tomatin to Moy
edit

"Some preparation works to this section include trees being cut down and a new railway bridge on the Highland Main Line, which were done in 2021 and 2022, ahead of the main construction work."

  • What about the new railway bridge? Was one built? A little clarification here would go a long way, I believe.

"This stretch is expected to start construction by the end of 2024."

  • I would consider removal of this sentence as later the paragraph states: 'expected to begin main construction in spring 2025.'
Tay Crossing to Ballinluig
edit

Good!

Table

edit

Good!

Delays

edit

I made some edits you may wish to review. I added a link and removed a duplicate link that you may wish to review.

This first paragraph says the same thing as a previous section Construction -> Proposed sections. I would suggest removing one or the other so that there isn't duplicate information.

Criticism

edit

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Images

edit

All images are pertinent and under creative commons.

Sources

edit

7 is dead, but the archive works.

9 the same.

The rest look good.


Overall, not too much needs to be changed to get this article to GA status, but a little work needs to be done. I will give you time to review and respond to my comments before posting a final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply