Talk:A9 dualling project/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: JuniperChill (talk · contribs) 16:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 07:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, @JuniperChill: I will be reviewing this article for the January 2025 Backlog Drive. This is an ongoing project so I hope that future edits will match the quality of a GA. BigChrisKenney (talk) 07:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Initial Assesment
editIntro
editAdded a comma you may wish to review.
History
editEarly upgrades
editI removed the conversion template as it was causing 'mile' to change to 'miles' which would have been incorrect.
I made some edits you may wish to review.
Speed cameras
editGood!
Road saftey statistics
editGood!
Construction
editAnnouncement
editGood!
Completed section (2015-2021)
editRemoved the conversion template. I made some edits you may wish to review.
Proposed sections
editI made a few edits you may wish to review.
Tomatin to Moy
edit"Some preparation works to this section include trees being cut down and a new railway bridge on the Highland Main Line, which were done in 2021 and 2022, ahead of the main construction work."
- What about the new railway bridge? Was one built? A little clarification here would go a long way, I believe.
"This stretch is expected to start construction by the end of 2024."
- I would consider removal of this sentence as later the paragraph states: 'expected to begin main construction in spring 2025.'
Tay Crossing to Ballinluig
editGood!
Table
editGood!
Delays
editI made some edits you may wish to review. I added a link and removed a duplicate link that you may wish to review.
This first paragraph says the same thing as a previous section Construction -> Proposed sections. I would suggest removing one or the other so that there isn't duplicate information.
Criticism
editI made some edits you may wish to review.
Images
editAll images are pertinent and under creative commons.
Sources
edit7 is dead, but the archive works.
9 the same.
The rest look good.
Overall, not too much needs to be changed to get this article to GA status, but a little work needs to be done. I will give you time to review and respond to my comments before posting a final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 08:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)