Talk:2024 CFL draft
Latest comment: 17 days ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 29 September 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:CFL Draft which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 29 September 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 06:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2024 CFL draft → 2024 CFL national draft
- 2023 CFL draft → 2023 CFL national draft
- 2022 CFL draft → 2022 CFL national draft
- 2021 CFL draft → 2021 CFL national draft
- 2025 CFL draft → 2025 CFL national draft
– Now that CFL draft is ambiguous with CFL global draft, would it be better to have less ambiguous titles for the national drafts? Dicklyon (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 16:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. cyberdog958Talk 03:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment/Question. Are most reliable sources doing this? Wikipedia should not do this before RS do. For example, this Apr 30, 2024 article from Athlon Sports first states,
Starting at 11 am EST, the CFL Global Draft gets underway
, then statesThe next phase of the day ends with the CFL Draft which starts at 8 pm EST
(not "2024 CFL national draft"). Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)- Good question. I was bothered by the ambiguity, and confused until I sorted it out in my mind, but it's not obvious if a move is the solution. That's why I phrased the proposal as a question. If it's better to wait and see if the disambiguated name catches on in sources, that's fine, too. But then maybe a hatnote or something to say there's another article about the other part of the draft would be in order? Dicklyon (talk) 22:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well, unless there is such evidence that most RS covering the CFL are using "national", including the annual live televised coverage on TSN,[1], and most of the same news sources that were previously linked back on Talk:CFL draft#Requested move 27 March 2024 (for a different issue there), I am going to have to Oppose this RM proposal until at least next year's draft. Zzyzx11 (talk) 14:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Good question. I was bothered by the ambiguity, and confused until I sorted it out in my mind, but it's not obvious if a move is the solution. That's why I phrased the proposal as a question. If it's better to wait and see if the disambiguated name catches on in sources, that's fine, too. But then maybe a hatnote or something to say there's another article about the other part of the draft would be in order? Dicklyon (talk) 22:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose for the same reasons as Zzyzx11. A hat note to the Global Draft is probably sufficient at this point. Esolo5002 (talk) 05:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Withdraw – Doesn't look like this will get much support, so I withdraw the suggestion. I'll let a closer close it. Dicklyon (talk) 23:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.