Talk:2016–17 College Football Playoff

Latest comment: 1 hour ago by BeanieFan11 in topic Did you know nomination

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2016–17 College Football Playoff/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 06:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 20:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Stable?

edit

Yes Cos (X + Z) 20:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio?

edit

Earwig shows a 7.4% due to the name and the quotes. Cos (X + Z) 20:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit
  • sources are styled well.
  • all sources are reliable except for [17] which is a blog.
  • doing a spot check of all the sources in 3 rounds. This passes.
  • Round 1
  • [19]. Y
  • [23]. Y
  • [14]. Y
  • [30]. 1st mention. Y 2nd mention. Y
  • [22]. Y
  • [5]. 1st mention. Y 2nd mention. Y
  • [6]. Y
  • Round 2
  • [8]. Y
  • [16]. Y
  • [25]. Y
  • [31]. Y

Prose

edit
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

edit

Improved to Good Article status by PCN02WPS (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 84 past nominations.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC).Reply