Talk:2013–14 South Pacific cyclone season
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Specialized archives: Tracks, October, December, January, February, March, April |
Other basin talkpages | 2013: Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere
2013-14: S. Hemisphere - SW. Indian - Australian - S. Pacific 2014: Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East. Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere |
Location of advisories
editRSMC Nadi
- Marine Bulletins
- Tropical Disturbance Summary
- Tropical Disturbance Advisory
- International Marine Warnings
- Cyclone Gale/Storm Warnings
- Cyclone Hurricane Warnings
- Cyclone Track Maps
- 3-Day Tropical Cyclone Outlook
Special Weather Bulletins
- Fiji
- Fiji & Rotuma
- Northern Cook Islands
- Southern Cook Islands
- Kiribati
- Niue
- Tokelau
- Tonga
- Tuvalu
- Wallis and Futuna
- Samoa
- Solomon Islands
- French Polynesia
- New Caledonia
Other links
- Tropical Disturbance Advisories Archives
- Unisys Archives
- GMDSS
- APECDI
- WX Trop
- MT Archive
- TCWC Wellington
JTWC:
14/15F
editIm wondering if it would be better to treat 14/15F as one system, since they may have merged together and both impacted Fiji. This would mean just one section for both depressions but we should keep the seasonal effects/timeline together.Jason Rees (talk) 14:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hadi
editI have boldy decided to combine the sections on 16/20F, since a forecaster from the BoM has privately stated to me that RSMC Nadi assigned the system that became Hadi two desigantions 16/20F. The 20F designation can be proved to be the remants of Hadi based on the Brisbane TWOs from Saturday onwards, while if you follow the TWO's through 16F can be proved to be Hadi.Jason Rees (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Subtropical storm?
editShould the subtropical storm per JTWC (98P) be mentioned somewhere? If not in its own section, under Other storms? atomic7732 19:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think it should be added to Other Storms as should a brief a mention of Ita, since per BoM it was 0.5 degrees away from the basin.Jason Rees (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed on the subtropical storm. not sure about Ita. On one hand, it did affect the Solmons. On the other, it was not an SPAC storm. YE Pacific Hurricane 20:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Tropical Disturbance 16F/20F (Hadi) Info
editShouldn't we add some more information on why this storm received 2 different designations from RSMC Nadi? Also, some extra info on the storm's behavior couldn't hurt either. 72.197.234.162 (talk) 00:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, and why don't we start an article on this system? It's pretty rare for a storm to cross basins multiple times like this one did, and to end up receiving 3 different identifiers from 2 different agencies. 72.197.234.162 (talk) 00:13, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- We do not have any information that we can cite on why it was assigned two designations by Nadi so we cant add it. I am also not a fan of giving it an article, just because it happened to move across the random 160E border three times especially when there is very little impact around.Jason Rees (talk) 00:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- Isn't there any more information out there that we could scrounge up to create this article? It would definitely help, since the data on the storm is split between 2 different season articles and seems to be a little muddy in some areas. LightandDark2000 (talk) 08:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- You all know where the logs of advisories are kept and how to write sections, but i am still opposed to giving it an article for the reasons i outlined above.Jason Rees (talk) 12:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Isn't there any more information out there that we could scrounge up to create this article? It would definitely help, since the data on the storm is split between 2 different season articles and seems to be a little muddy in some areas. LightandDark2000 (talk) 08:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- We do not have any information that we can cite on why it was assigned two designations by Nadi so we cant add it. I am also not a fan of giving it an article, just because it happened to move across the random 160E border three times especially when there is very little impact around.Jason Rees (talk) 00:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
SE Charts
edit@LightandDark2000 and 178.202.135.29: I do not care if you think it is better for the readers - the bolding in the season effects charts is not needed and goes against MOS:Bold which states that "Boldface is only for certain usages."Jason Rees (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
To do:
editJust a general list of what is left to do with the article.
- 02F needs its impact expanding if possible.
- Ian, June, Edna, Kofi, Hadi, Lusi and Mike need expanding.
09F needs writing/merging with other systems.- 13F,
17F,21F need writing/cleaning up - Other systems will need a general clean up to make it flow better once 09F, 13F, 17F and 21F are written. A decent seasonal summuary would be good to get written as well.Jason Rees (talk) 23:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2013–14 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6KPVLsZe1?url=http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/ahead/south-pacific/tc.shtml to http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/ahead/south-pacific/tc.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)