Talk:2011 Newfoundland and Labrador general election

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Polling

edit

I'm wondering how to go about adding the polling results of a NTV/Telelink poll released this week. Unlike CRA they didn't exclude the undecided when they showed there numbers, therefore if I put the information in to the chart in this article I would either need a place to put the undecided support or add up the results without the undecided. What should be done? Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 00:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Other provinces have a column for other. This is an interesting situation, because the only poll reporting doesn't report any other. I am undecided too, the right thing to do is add them as reported, but that wouldn't compare properly with the others. 117Avenue (talk) 03:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Okay I'll think about it some more. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 04:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think the appropriate step is to calculate percentages in term of decided voters. That would be what CRA is doing, and what Wikipedia is reporting for other provinces. For other provinces, we need an "Other" column to show decided voters who opted for minor parties. That doesn't apply in N&L (except possibly for the Labrador Party?), so an "Other" column isn't necessary here. Tunborough (talk) 11:09, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Riding numbers

edit

I don't understand why riding numbers have been added. Elections Newfoundland and Labrador doesn't seem to give any numbers official status, [1][2] so are doing it? -Rrius (talk) 23:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I was also questioning it, supposedly Elections NL use it in some of their charts. I find it a bit hard to read. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 23:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Elections N&L uses these numbers, for example in the report on the 2007 election, and list of election officials. Media outlets will also be using these numbers, at least internally. Tunborough (talk) 01:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I first saw the use of riding numbers on New Brunswick general election, 2010, for one, and thought it was the usual style. Tunborough (talk) 01:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Lorraine Michael.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Lorraine Michael.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Newfoundland and Labrador general election, 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply