Talk:2002 Australian Grand Prix

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=85946
  • In 2002 Australian Grand Prix on 2011-05-25 07:18:06, 400 BAD_REQUEST
  • In 2002 Australian Grand Prix on 2011-06-10 08:54:34, 400 BAD_REQUEST

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.motorsport.com/news/article.asp?ID=85937&FS=F1
  • In 2002 Australian Grand Prix on 2011-05-25 07:18:06, 400 BAD_REQUEST
  • In 2002 Australian Grand Prix on 2011-06-10 08:54:43, 400 BAD_REQUEST

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.grandprix.com/races/australian-gp-2002.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 Australian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dawnseeker2000 (talk · contribs) 02:37, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

MWright96, I wanted to watch the race on YouTube before reviewing the article, but didn't see it anywhere, so my plan is to look for typos, fix dashes and formatting if necessary, then will give the thumbs up. I'm pretty sure I've reviewed your work before, and I'm pretty sure that means that it's unlikely there will need to be any changes on your part. Great presentation as always. Dawnseeker2000 05:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

@Dawnseeker2000: Thought I leave a comment as I've reviewed a Formula 1 race before. There's a copy of it on the Internet Archive if you're looking for a copy. I used this site when reviewing a 2014 F1 article for MWright as well. I'll leave the review to you :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for that. Much appreciated! Not that it's totally necessary to see the race for a review, but I won't complain about hearing the glory of the V10 era again. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 20:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Watched the race. What an event. Action packed. I'm giving the OK on the seven items that I absolutely know are fine. I think that the remainder are going to be OK or nearly OK as well, but that is just after having a quick look at the article. I have not read it completely yet. Dawnseeker2000 10:07, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

I've made some minor changes in light of the manual of style. It is a good read. I'm marking all requirements met. Good job. Dawnseeker2000 15:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Australian racing driver Mark Webber was given an impromptu podium ceremony for finishing fifth at the 2002 Australian Grand Prix? Source: The day Webber drove his clunker into nation's hearts" - The Weekend Australian

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Acanthurus olivaceus

Improved to Good Article status by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC).

• Very well written GA article, and long enough. No image issues. The hook is very interesting and inline cited (was behind a paywal but was able to get a copy). The article is neutral and no copyright issues detected. QPQ has been done. Good to go. Britishfinance (talk) 10:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)