Really bad

edit

This article is really, truly bad. I'm going to see what I can do to improve it, but I'm not knowledgeable in every subject, even relating to music. Ugh. bob rulz (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't be the best editor either, but I'll try to improve it a little and remove things that don't belong. RKFS (talk) 21:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I dont feel that the statement about Amy Winehouse is applicable in any sense. She didnt have a dramatic influence on popular music in this decade and I wouldnt call most of her music rock and especially not jazz-rock...thats a whole other genre completely...Also, It seems that the majority of this page bases a genre of music on small examples from entirely mainstream music sources which have had little relevance on music as a whole to this generation, especially so in the"Dance Music" section and the reference to a sixties pop revival where the author referred to singles which really had no impact on these areas...I personally listen to a lot of sixties pop revival bands and a lot of dance music and these paltry singles mean nothing to me or other people I know who listen to these genres...Lemmonn sweeper (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)lemmonn_sweeper —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.157.48.7 (talk) 01:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • This article needs to include a section dealing with the massive expansion of the music industry vis-a-vis its' easy availability online. More people are listening to music now than at any other time in history due to the worldwide effect of the internet. Sstteevvee (talk) 21:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

This article is still terrible, where's the moderation? One of the worst Wikipedia articles I've ever seen. Radiohead is apparently Garage Rock according to this article. I'll try to fix it a little, but it still needs saving. RKFS (talk) 06:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


I can't enjoy this article, either. I can't enjoy 00's music much, either, so... Anyway, con you guys honestly call Nickelback Rock?!?! --Knick99 (talk) 22:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps it would be good to include a section about the explosion of genres and the difficulty at defining music. Also the music blogs that popped up and the increasing 'alternative' scene. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.229.181.171 (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I CANNOT believe this is Wikipedia. Check these extracts: GRUP? Destiny's Child is considerated (CONSIDERATED?) the biggest R&B Act of the decade as well as the best-selling girl grup (GRUP?) of the decade with 50 million records worldwide.

Or how about:

Dance music had its ups and downs in the 2000s. Singles like Heaven (DJ Sammy song) in 2002 and Everytime We Touch (Cascada song) in 2006 became some of the biggest dance hits of the decade.

Is this an essay written by a ten year old kid or something? Geeky Freak (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Christian music

edit

I think Christian music should be discussed here. Many Christian rock and pop artists were popular in the decade, and some of them had entered the mainstream charts, such as Mute Math, Stacie Orrico, and Matt Kearney. We also have a lot of Christian and gospel influences, especially in country, hip-hop, R&B, and rock. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.29.213.199 (talk) 17:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Basshunter

edit

I was flipping through this page and noticed that Basshunter is not up here. I could understand him not being as popular in the US but he's really popular over in Europe! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.111.126.207 (talk) 04:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


THIS IS A REMIXX .... A BASSHUNTER REMIXXX, DOOF DOOF DOOF DOOF —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.1.29 (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Picture captions - "is referred"

edit

There's an awful lot of weasel words in the picture captions - "is referred", "considered" and so on. Do we have sources? Or can we just simplify it to the facts? Mdwh (talk) 02:39, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Every single one of those captions is horribly written. Many of them simply feel like nods to the artist(s) by some overly eager fan.

Coldplay/Linkin Park Bias?

edit

The British Music paragraph in the rock section is full of Coldplay bias, and seriously, in the rock section it lists Linkin Park as the best rock act of the decade? what a joke. this article is completely full of opinionated crap.--CombustionMan1 (talk) 00:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

JAZZ

edit

There was no Jazz played in this decade? Sstteevvee (talk) 17:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Alicia Keys

edit

Why is Alicia Keys mentioned in the adult contemporary field? Billboard named her the top R&B artist of the decade so she should be included in the R&B section. --93.146.213.186 (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

fixed it TheCuriousGnome (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Indie?

edit

Someone needs to add this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.191.214 (talk) 02:49, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pink

edit

Where is Pink??? She is really important and there is NO mention of her!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.137.2.44 (talk) 23:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:Requested moves which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 22:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Only music Industry?

edit

I have realized that this article is only about the music industry, the best selling artists. Besides, the Latin American section seems a joke, RBD may be the most succesful band to mexican teenagers, but is far of being important to the rest of Latin America. This article should be about musical movments or tends, and his most importants figures, no matter how good sellers they are but how important to the cultural development and musical inspiration. Just a few examples, in Chile is the New Chilean Cumbia or the Nu Folk, and the Cumbia Villera in Argentina. I would like to help to write the article but my english is not so good, it'd take too long. Thanks! --Tommy The Wise (talk) 18:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

No mention of "Kid A?"

edit

Radiohead is mentioned briefly, but I'm really surprised that more focus isn't given to them. Kid A was hugely important in terms of music and In Rainbows created waves in the music industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.227.159.150 (talk) 22:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Gorillaz live 2010.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Gorillaz live 2010.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Gorillaz live 2010.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The "un-timeless" era of perishable/commodity music

edit

Is there any analysis that little if anything from this decade that was played past its chart run? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.23.16.196 (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in 2000s in music

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2000s in music's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "cert":

  • From Janet Jackson: Gold & Platinum, Recording Industry Association of America, 1958–2009, retrieved 2009-10-07
  • From Gin Wigmore: "Latest Gold / Platinum Singles". RadioScope. Retrieved 1 June 2010.
  • From Smashproof: "Latest Gold / Platinum Singles". RadioScope New Zealand. 25 October 2009. Retrieved 28 October 2009.
  • From Carrie Underwood: "Gold and Platinum - July 2005". CRIA.ca. Canadian Recording Industry Association. Retrieved 2012-07-01.
  • From Jesse & Joy: "Certificaciones" (in Spanish). Asociación Mexicana de Productores de Fonogramas y Videogramas. Retrieved 2010-05-01.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 12:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2000s in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2000s in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2000s in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2000s in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on 2000s in music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nearly the entire "Rock" section is composed of un-sourced and/or subjective claims.

edit

See headline. It really needs some work. Currently it reads like someone pulling "facts" relating to sales figures and global trends out of their ass, with hyperbole mixed in throughout for good measure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PopularMusicEditor (talkcontribs) 04:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Milk

edit

In the first line of the article it says "American Milk Culture". Is this a typo? I'm not sure what milk culture is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.95.254.216 (talk) 04:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply