Talk:1999 Indian general election
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The party name should be on the list not the English translation of party meaning.
editStop adding translation of party menaing in the list. The party name should be on the list not the English translation of party meaning. I dont know who added this nonsense, I have removed it please dont put back again. --106.51.98.117 (talk) 13:35, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Indian general election, 1999. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080604152951/http://www.asiasociety.org:80/publications/indian_elections.13.a.html to http://www.asiasociety.org/publications/indian_elections.13.a.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061001152855/http://www.asiasociety.org/publications/indian_elections.13.app2.html to http://www.asiasociety.org/publications/indian_elections.13.app2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Indian general election, 1999. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081207201816/http://www.eci.gov.in:80/ to http://www.eci.gov.in/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718183222/http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/StatisticalReports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf to http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/statisticalreports/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
CPI(M) in infobox
editHappyjit Singh, CPI(M) shouldn't be added in this page because it didn't get even 10% seats, nor was it a coalition partner or anything. INC is added in 2014 and 2019 because it's the main opposition and something has to be there. Ok123l (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's a very arbitrary argument. There is no 10% threshold, no requirement to have coalition partner etc. Also, there is no reason to limit to 3 parties in the infobox, there are plenty of cases with far more parties featured. In this case BJP and INC won only slightly more than 50% of the total vote combined, so it is clearly warranted to feature other parties. --Soman (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)