Talk:1995–96 Chinese Basketball Association season

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Basketball

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball

Requested move 14 March 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) samee converse 20:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

– per main article Chinese Basketball Association, and per policy WP:Article_titles#Article_title_format: Avoid ambiguous abbreviations: Abbreviations and acronyms are often ambiguous and thus should be avoided unless the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject. The abbreviation "CBA" is massively ambiguous, even within the context of Chinese sport: see CBA (disambiguation)#Sports ... and the Chinese Basketball Association is nowhere near being the primary usage of "CBA". BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Support – "CBA" is ambiguous; the proposed titles are not. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Support: because:

Ambiguity. CBA is clearly an ambiguous term, even when it is narrowed down only to sports, as evidenced by CBA#Sports.
1. WP:TITLEFORMAT says to Avoid ambiguous abbreviations
2. WP:ACRONYMTITLE says when a title abbreviation is ambiguous, there is a strong preference for natural disambiguation
Consistency.
1. Per WP:CONSISTENCY, the article on the Chinese Basketball Association is at Chinese Basketball Association, not CBA, therefore it follows that its related pages should follow the same form.

The proposal also adheres to MOS:DATERANGE.

SITH (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic