Talk:01-for London
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from 01-for London appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 00:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the replacement of arts listings television show 01-for London was described as "like having to swap a bright yellow curvy Japanese sports car for a dumpy little khaki-coloured old Ford Fiesta"? Source: "Lesley tarted with heart in Carlton's new Big City, which is something south-east viewers are going to have to put up with as their what's on guide instead of 01 For London, which is like having to swap a bright yellow curvy Japanese sports car for a dumpy little khaki-coloured old Ford Fiesta." from: Morley, Paul (9 January 1993). "Television: GMTV, Big City, The Graham Greene Trilogy". The Guardian. ProQuest - ID 293334603.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 08:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC).
New article that was moved to mainspace on 29 December 2021 is 2,171 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected and duplication detector of online sources[1][2][3] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 199 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 2 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source from The Guardian (AGF offline ref). QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 01:08, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
