Talk:Óscar Iván Zuluaga
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Mijotoba in topic Scandal claims
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Óscar Iván Zuluaga article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Scandal claims
editMr Zulagua argued that he was being framed.
If you make a charge against someone (for example that they were recorded discussing an illegal hacking - and how would the recording have taken place?) then there is a moral obligation upon you to mention the defense the person being attacked makes against the charge. Mr Zulagua denies the voice on the recording is his - he publically denied it during the televised Presidential debate. You can not honestly claim you do not know that the man says he is being framed - you are deliberately choosing to leave out his defense.2.124.130.249 (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I have gone ahead and added more information about the scandal as you requested, even though you could have done that yourself. Please assume good faith before you go ahead and start throwing moral obligations and accusing editors of deliberate editing. mijotoba (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)