A self-uniting marriage is one in which the couple are married without the presence of a third-party officiant. Although non-denominational, this method of getting married is sometimes referred to as a "Quaker marriage", after the marriage practice of the Religious Society of Friends, for which see Quaker wedding.

United States

edit

California

edit

California allows "non-clergy marriage" by "members of a particular religious society or denomination not having clergy for the purpose of solemnizing marriage or entering the marriage relation" if specified forms, including the signatures of two witnesses, are properly completed and filed.[1] An atheist couple in San Francisco was reportedly allowed to have a non-clergy marriage under this provision of California law by entering "atheist" in the box for "religious society or denomination" on the non-clergy marriage form.[2]

Colorado

edit

Colorado allows self-solemnization without requiring a special form of application or witnesses.[3][4] Colorado is one of two states that allow self-solemnization without any caveats or restrictions.[5] With self solemnizations, these requirements are cut out, and when a couple gets married in Colorado, they can have their own ceremony and sign their own marriage license.[6]

District of Columbia

edit

The District of Columbia allows couples to officiate their own wedding.[7][8]

Illinois

edit

Illinois law states, "if no individual acting alone solemnized the marriage, both parties to the marriage, shall complete the marriage certificate form and forward it to the county clerk within 10 days after such marriage is solemnized."[9] Nonetheless, such weddings must be "in accordance with the prescriptions of any religious denomination, Indian Nation or Tribe or Native Group."[9]

Kansas

edit

Kansas law provides, "The two parties themselves, by mutual declarations that they take each other as husband and wife, in accordance with the customs, rules and regulations of any religious society, denomination or sect to which either of the parties belong, may be married without an authorized officiating person."[10] And further provides that, "All marriages solemnized among the society called Friends, or Quakers, in the form previously practiced and in use in their meetings shall be good and valid and shall not be construed as affected by any of the foregoing provisions of this act."[11]

Maine

edit

Maine exempts "Quakers or Friends" and "members of the Baháʼí faith" from the requirement for a third-party officiant.[12]

Nevada

edit

Nevada law provides, "All marriages solemnized among the people called 'Friends' or 'Quakers,' in the forms heretofore practiced and in use in their meetings, shall be good and valid."[13]

Pennsylvania

edit

Pennsylvania has recognized such marriages for centuries (due to its Quaker origins and history of religious tolerance) and has offered licenses for these marriages for decades.[14] These marriages only require the signatures of two witnesses in place of an officiant.

The issuance of self-uniting marriage licenses is controversial, however.[citation needed] Some Pennsylvania counties do not offer this form of license at all.[15] Others only allowed such marriages when license applicants could prove they were members of a recognized religion without clergy, such as Quakers, the Amish, and the Baháʼí Faith;[16] however, in 2007, a Federal judge ruled that a Pennsylvania couple that was denied a self-uniting marriage on the basis of their secular beliefs must be allowed such a license.[17]

Wisconsin

edit

Wisconsin allows self-uniting marriages in accordance with the customs, rules and regulations of any religious society, denomination or sect to which either of the parties may belong.[18] The county clerk may ask the applicants to state their religious affiliation and provide evidence of that affiliation. Secular humanism is an acceptable religious affiliation for obtaining a self-uniting marriage license.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "California Family Code, Section 307". Archived from the original on 30 June 2016. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
  2. ^ "How to Get a Non-Clergy Wedding in California". Femme Frugality. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
  3. ^ "14-2-109. Solemnization and registration", Colorado Revised Statues, archived from the original on 20 March 2012, retrieved 26 July 2011, A marriage may be solemnized... by the parties to the marriage....
  4. ^ "Colorado Marriage Laws: Crucial Details for Couples 2024 : Wild Wed Photography". wild-wed.com. 14 May 2024. Archived from the original on 19 September 2024. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
  5. ^ "How to Self Solemnize in Colorado". Leah Goetzel Photography. 19 April 2021. Archived from the original on 23 May 2024. Retrieved 19 April 2021.
  6. ^ "Colorado Self Solemnization Guide". Vows and Peaks. 3 July 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  7. ^ DC Courts: Information on Marriage, archived from the original on 14 May 2014, retrieved 12 May 2014, Pursuant to the "Marriage Officiant Amendment Act of 2013", the following persons or organizations are authorized or are candidates for authorization to perform marriages in the District of Columbia:... (9) the parties to the marriage (both parties to the marriage must apply in person with a valid government issued identification).
  8. ^ "Eloping in DC: the East Coast's Vegas". Femme Frugality. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
  9. ^ a b Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/209(a)) as of 2019-06-14. Retrieved 2022-05-20.
  10. ^ "Kansas Revised Statutes, 23-2504 (c)". Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 20 July 2017.
  11. ^ "Kansas Revised Statutes, 23-2516 (a)". Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 20 July 2017.
  12. ^ "Maine Revised Statutes, Title 19-A, §658". Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 4 August 2016.
  13. ^ "Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 122.150". Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2016.
  14. ^ U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Temporary Restraining Order, Knelly v. Wagner Archived May 15, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  15. ^ Ward, Paula Reed (22 September 2007). "Couple fighting for rights over rites". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Archived from the original on 28 September 2018. Retrieved 26 July 2011. However, officials [in Butler county] said they don't issue that type of license at all
  16. ^ Knelly v. Wagner, Federal Court, Western District. "Knelly v. Wagner :: American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania". Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 10 October 2007.
  17. ^ Ward, Paula Reed (28 September 2007). "Judge says couple can have self-uniting marriage". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
  18. ^ "Wisconsin Legislature: 765.16(1m)(c)". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on 2 June 2023. Retrieved 7 August 2020.