The Louisiana Code of Evidence[1] is a code of evidence law, enacted by section 1 of Act 515 of 1988, under Louisiana Civil Law. The Code became effective on January 1, 1989,[2] and governs proceedings in the courts of Louisiana to the extent and with the exceptions stated in Article 1101 of the Code.[3] The Bill for Act 515 of 1988 was Senate Bill 155, introduced by Senator Ben Bagert.
| Louisiana Code of Evidence | |
|---|---|
| Louisiana State Legislature | |
| Enacted | January 1, 1989 |
| Legislative history | |
| Bill title | section 1 of Act 515 of 1988 |
| Introduced by | Ben Bagert |
| Related legislation | |
| Senate Bill 155 | |
| Summary | |
| Attempted 1818, 1956, 1986, 1987, and 1988 | |
| Keywords | |
| Governor Buddy Roemer | |
Laws for a code of evidence was introduced in 1818, 1956, 1986, and 1987. After nearly two centuries of failed attempts to codify Louisiana's evidence law, the Louisiana State Legislature enacted an Evidence Code in 1988.
History
editThe evidentiary reform movement began in Britain in the early nineteenth century under the leadership of Jeremy Bentham. "Within a short time of the publication of Bentham's ‘Theory of Judicial Evidence’ in 1818, Louisiana's Edward Livingston,[4] considered "America's Bentham", by Wigmore,[5] prepared and proposed to the Louisiana Legislature a Code of Evidence for this state, designed to govern proceedings in both civil and criminal cases. Had it been adopted, the development of evidence law in the United States might well have been very different. However, the Livingston Evidence Code was not enacted.[6]
By the middle of the twentieth century, Louisiana evidence law had become notoriously murky and uncertain. This confusion led to a second attempt at codification in 1956. After some ten years of effort, the Louisiana Law Institute abandoned the project, in part because the contending forces simply could not agree.[7]
Current law
editIn 1979 the quest for an evidence code was renewed by Ben Bagert, a state legislator who was also a lawyer with an active litigation practice. By then, a Federal Code of Evidence had been adopted and Bagert had experienced, first hand, how justice was better served when the court and the litigants had a rule book to guide them. Because Bagert believed that these benefits were achievable in state court proceedings, he persuaded the Legislature to direct that a code of evidence be drafted.[8] Following this directive, the Louisiana Law Institute again accepted the challenge of compiling a code and a proposal was published and submitted to the legislature in 1986. As with the Livingston Code and the 1956 attempt by the Law Institute, the Proposed Code proved controversial. What the plaintiff bar liked, the defense bar disliked. What prosecutors abhorred, criminal defense lawyers applauded. The Proposed Code did not come out of committee in the 1986 legislature. In the 1987 session, another stalemate[9] blocked the adoption of Bagert’s bill proposing an Evidence Code.
Observers of the legislature were predicting a similar fate for the Proposed Code in the 1988 legislative session; however, as lead author of the bill, Bagert had been conducting frequent meetings with the competing forces who had doomed the codes of prior years. On the night before his bill was to be considered by Senate Committee, Senator Bagert, sensing that a compromise was achievable, convened a meeting of opposing factions in the Senate basement. In attendance besides Senator Bagert were Kerry Triche, of the Louisiana Law Institute; Jack Martzell, of the Louisiana Trial Lawyers Association; John Mamoulides and Bernie Boudreaux, district attorneys representing the District Attorneys Association; and Robert Glass, Frank Desalvo, James E. Boren, and John Reed, eminent criminal defense lawyers. Just before midnight a compromise was achieved and additional amendments were drafted for consideration by the committee when morning arrived.
On the ensuing day, legislative observers were stunned to see that the competing adversaries had agreed to the enactment of an evidence code as amended. After the compromise, Senator Bagert’s bill was enacted by the legislature and signed into law by Governor Buddy Roemer.
References
edit- Code of Evidence
- Louisiana Code of Evidence Practice Guide. Third Edition. Michie. 2005. ISBN 9780820574806.
- West's Louisiana Code of Evidence Annotated
- Force and Rault. Handbook on Louisiana Evidence Law. 2014 edition. Thomson West. ISBN 9780314624628.
- Rault Jr., Garard A. (January 1989). "An Overview of the New Louisiana Code of Evidence—Its Imperfections and Uncertainties". Louisiana Law Review. 49 (3).
- Pugh, George W.; Force, Robert; Rault Jr., Gerard A.; Triche, Kerry J. (January 1989). "The Louisiana Code of Evidence—A Retrospective and Prospective View". Louisiana Law Review. 49 (3).
- ^ The citation of this Code by this title is authorised by article 1102 of this Code.
- ^ Act 515 of 1988, section 12(3). Digitised copy.
- ^ Louisiana Code of Evidence, article 101
- ^ Force, Pugh, Rault and Triche, "Louisiana Code of Evidence - A Retrospective and Prospective View" (1989) 49 La. L. Rev. 689
- ^ Hargrave, W. Lee (2004). LSU Law: The Louisiana State University Law School from 1906 to 1977. Louisiana State University Press. p. 4. ISBN 9780807129142. Retrieved January 21, 2015.
{{cite book}}:|work=ignored (help) - ^ Moore, Elon H. (1928). "Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology: Livingston Code, The". Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Retrieved December 29, 2014.
- ^ Rault Jr., Gerard A. (January 1989). "An Overview of the New Louisiana Code of Evidence - Its Imperfections and Uncertainties". Legal. Louisiana Law Review. pp. 698, volume 49, number 3. Retrieved January 20, 2015.
- ^ La. H.R. Con. Res. 250, Reg. Sess. (1979) by Representative Ben Bagert
- ^ Senate Bill by Senator Bagert was rejected.