Wikipedia

Kutupalong refugee camp

Kutupalong refugee camp (Bengali: কুতুপালং শরণার্থী শিবির) is the world's largest refugee camp.[2][3][4] It is located in Ukhia, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, and is inhabited mostly by Rohingya refugees who fled from ethnic and religious persecution in neighboring Myanmar.[5][6] It is one of two government-run refugee camps in Cox's Bazar, the other being the Nayapara refugee camp.[7]

Kutupalong refugee camp
কুতুপালং শরণার্থী শিবির
Kutupalong refugee camp in Bangladesh (Photo taken by Maaz Hussain/VOA)
Kutupalong refugee camp in Bangladesh
(Photo taken by Maaz Hussain/VOA)
Kutupalong refugee camp is located in Bangladesh
Kutupalong refugee camp
Kutupalong refugee camp
Location in Bangladesh
Coordinates: 21°12′45″N 92°09′48″E / 21.2126°N 92.1634°E / 21.2126; 92.1634
Country Bangladesh
DivisionChittagong Division
DistrictCox's Bazar District
UpazilaUkhia Upazila
Area
 • Total
13 km2 (5 sq mi)
Population
 (30 June 2020)[1]
 • Total
598,545
 • Density46,000/km2 (120,000/sq mi)
 • Camp
16,714 (Kutupalong RC); 581,831 (expansion site)

The UNHCR Camp office at Kutupalong is supported by seven international entities: the governments of the European Union, the United States, Canada, Japan, Finland, Sweden and the Stichting INGKA Foundation.[8][9]

Name

edit

Although the "Kutupalong Registered Rohingya Refugee camp," in Ukhia, is the original camp,[10] "Kutupalong refugee camp" may also refer to the makeshift camps that have sprung up adjacent to the government-operated camp, although these are not officially part of the refugee camp. Makeshift camps at Kutupalong and surrounding areas have grown to accommodate refugees fleeing Myanmar over the years. In late 2017, due to an unprecedented influx of refugees,[10] the Kutupalong makeshift camp and surrounding camps at Ghumdum, Balukhali, Thangkhali and others swelled rapidly, merging into each other. The International Organization for Migration refers to the collective settlement as the Kutupalong–Balukhali expansion site.[11]

History

edit

Development and evolution

edit

The camp began informally in 1991, after thousands of Rohingyas fled from the Burmese military's Operation Pyi Thaya (Operation Clean and Beautiful Nation).[12][13]

The two refugee camps of Kutupalong and Nayapara had a combined population of around 34,000 registered refugees in July 2017.[14]

Beginning 25 August 2017, extensive attacks upon Myanmar's Rohingya in Rakhine state, by Myanmar's military and local civilians, drove hundreds of thousands of Rohingya to flee Myanmar, into Bangladesh,[15][16][17] swelling the camp.[10]

In early September 2017, Bangladesh's Disaster Management and Relief Minister said there was "no restriction on Rohingyas' entry" into Bangladesh, and those refugees would be sheltered "as long as they wanted."[10] The Bangladesh government decided to bring all the Rohingya refugees "to a particular place," and build a camp for them in Kutupalong. The government's forest department allocated a portion of its 5,000 acres in Kutupalong for an expanded settlement. In all, 3,000 acres were allocated for a camp developed to accommodate up to 800,000 refugees.[10][18] In September 2017, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimated that the combined population of the two refugee camps had increased to over 77,000.[19]

Since 2018, Kutupalong refugee camp has been the world's largest refugee camp.[20][21][22]

With flimsy shelters, built on steep hillsides, the camps are prone to flooding and landslides, particularly during monsoons.[23][24][25] In August 2018, Human Rights Watch urged Bangladesh to relocate the camps to sturdier structures, on safer ground in Cox's Bazar.[26][24]

On 30 June 2020, the Kutupalong refugee camp and expansion site had a combined population of 598,545 and 187,423 families, with an area of just 13 square kilometres.[1][27] As of June 2024, nearly 950,000 refugees are in the camps in Cox's Bazar.[28]

Environmental issues

edit
 
Before and After 2017 Rohingya Crisis

By late 2019, the development of the camps had been partially accomplished through the exploitation and destruction of 8,000 acres of forested area—including over 6,164 acres for living space, and 1,837 acres of forest for firewood and building materials (particularly bamboo), and other environmental losses, estimated to total about Tk24,200,000,000 (US$290,400,000) -- alarming local citizens, environmentalists, and government officials.[29][30]

Critically endangered Asian elephants, whose natural habitat includes the area around Cox's Bazar, endanger camp residents because the camps are on the elephant's historical migratory route and grazing areas, resulting in human-elephant conflicts, which, by late 2019, had killed at least 13 Rohingya in the Kutupalong-Balukhali settlement. In response, officials of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) developed a mitigation program, which included hundreds of Rohingya refugee volunteers organized into Elephant Response Teams (ERTs) to respond to the events, typically driving elephants away through standardized techniques.[29][31][30]

Restrictions

edit

Local Bangladeshis have complained of Rohingya from the camps undermining natives' job prospects[32] and becoming involved in criminal activity (particularly illicit drug trade in ya ba, a type of methamphetamine).[33] Also, authorities have struggled to cope with human traffickers smuggling Rohingya into and out of Bangladesh (particularly by sea),[34] and exploiting women and children for the region's sex trade.[35] In response, the authorities have restricted Rohingya refugees' movements into and out of the camps, and limited their right to work or travel outside the camps—resulting in rising hardship and frustration for the refugees.[32][36]

Relocation and repatriation attempts

edit

Attempted repatriation to Myanmar

edit

By mid-2018—as the burden of hosting nearly a million refugees (mostly at Kutupalong) became increasingly stressful and frustrating to the Bangladesh government and public—they began pushing for repatriation of the Rohingya, back to Myanmar.[37][38]

However, Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh refused to be repatriated, due to continuing persecution and violence of the Rohingya still in Myanmar, and Myanmar's refusal to accept Rohingya demands to be reinstated as citizens, restored to their lands and property, granted freedom, and have international observers or peacekeepers to safeguard the Rohingyas' rights and safety[39][40][41]—demands supported by international organizations.[42][43][44] The Rohingya refugees boycotted and protested repatriation events in 2018[39] and 2019,[45] and shortly after the last 2019 repatriation event, on the second anniversary of the 25 August 2017 attacks on the Rohingya, a mass memorial service and protest arose in the camps, involving tens of thousands of Rohingya (some estimates say 100,000[46][47]), catching alarmed Bangladesh national authorities by surprise (though district officials had been aware of the event).[48][49][50]

Attempted relocation to Bhasan Char island

edit

Efforts to reduce the population of the camps—by moving about 100,000 Rohingya to an island—met with equally firm resistance. Group "shelters," and elevated storm shelters, were built by the government on Bhasan Char—a newly emerged silt island in the Bay of Bengal, 37 miles from the mainland (and over 50 miles from the camps) -- but, again, the Rohingya refused relocation from the camps, citing fears of isolation from society and aid, vulnerability to cyclones (the low island was reported to flood annually, particularly being submerged during storms at high tide), absence of forest and farmland needed for subsistence, and effective imprisonment.[51][52] Their objections have been continually supported by international human rights organizations and officials[52][53][54] and aid organizations, and expert reports on the island and climate.[51][52]

Crackdown and new restrictions

edit

Following the refugees' mass boycott of the Bangladeshi government's repatriation and relocation efforts, and mass protests, in 2019, top government officials expressed anger at the organized resistance and protests, accused aid agencies of encouraging them, and vowed to take actions to prevent future such resistance.[45][49][55]

Among the government's first counter-measures were increases in military presence throughout the camps, to preserve law and order (according to the government) -- though refugees claimed that they were harassed by the troops, who were particularly aggressive towards organizers of the Rohingyas' 25 August 2019 mass rally.[36]

In early September 2019, the government banned two aid agencies from the camps—a U.S. agency, Adventist Development and Relief Agency (ADRA), and a local agency, Al Markazul Islami—whom it accused of "instigating" the Rohingya to reject the recent repatriation effort.[56] Foreign Minister AK Momen further warned that the United Nations agencies might be kicked out of the country if they did not support the government's island-relocation plans.[55]

In mid-September 2019, the government began encircling the camps with barbed wire, saying it was to combat "human trafficking"[57]—though later declaring it was to restrict further expansion of the camps.[58]

Communications restrictions

edit

Also, in September 2019, the government began asking, then instructing, telecommunications companies to restrict telecommunications access in the camps. By forbidding sale of cell phone SIM cards to Rohingya, and reducing cellular telephone service from 4G and 3G levels—down to only 2G levels—internet communications to, from, and within the camps became impractical.[22][59]

Defending the internet blackout, the government cited "security" concerns, noting criminal activity in the camps—though refugees, and some of their advocates, complained that the blackout made the refugees more vulnerable to criminals, and potentially unable to call police as a crime was happening.[22][59] The restrictions have continued, intermittently, until becoming continuous—over the objections of international human rights and aid organizations.[36]

In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, dozens of human-rights and aid organizations warned that the communications blackout would limit refugees' timely access to reliable medical information, advice and assistance, and increase confusion, misinformation, paranoia and panic, and aggravate the spread of the virus within the densely populated camps.[60][61][62] However the government refused to lift the ban, continuing to cite "safety" and "security" concerns.[63]

April–May 2020

edit

In April and May 2020, several different major events happened in the camps, with a cumulative effect that heightened tensions and created new issues in the camps.

These included:[64]

Fires

edit

On 12 May 2020, a fire erupted from a gas-cylinder shop in the camp, spreading through hundreds of homes in the camp's largest fire to date. Ten people were injured, 330 homes/shops were destroyed, and 300 were damaged. Such fires had been predicted as likely for such overcrowded refugee camps.[65]

COVID-19 pandemic

edit

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began spreading globally in early 2020, experts and aid agencies like the World Health Organization (WHO) spokesperson in Bangladesh warned that densely populated refugee camps in and around Cox's Bazar were at risk, especially due to poor sanitation and nutrition predisposing the residents to severe illness.[66][67] Without high-speed internet to quickly communicate health information or adequate resources to distribute medical care, the camps' five hospitals, with a combined total of 340 beds, were predictably overwhelmed by COVID-19 cases in less than two months, subsequently raising deaths from malaria. Misinformation spread by word of mouth included rumors that the virus was not highly contagious and that health workers were killing infected patients, resulting in patients not seeking treatment until they became severely ill and had already infected others.[66][68] Officials and medical experts warned that COVID-19 deaths in the camps could reach 2,000 or more, potentially exceeding deaths directly caused by military persecution in Myanmar.[69][70][71]

By March 2022, Bangladeshi authorities further restricted movement between the camp and larger country to reduce transmission, increasing to a complete lockdown throughout Cox's Bazar by the following month, which prevented the entry of 80% of arriving aid workers, such as those returning from travel abroad.[71][72] These measures were enforced by police and military patrols, leaving the Rohingya refugees with dwindling food supplies, reduced medical assistance, and halted educational/counseling services.[66][73] COVID-19 first arrived in the camps in May, confirmed through positive tests from two Rohingya refugees and ten Bangladeshis in the surrounding area.[74]

Continued internet and cellphone blackout

edit

The Bangladesh government continued the internet communications blackout in the camps, despite warnings from aid agencies and human rights organizations that limiting communications to, from, and within the camps would result in dangerously inadequate responses to outbreaks of COVID-19, and to misinformation, paranoia and panic that could threaten public health.[60][61][62] Refugee commissioner Mahbub Alam Talukder asked the government to end the communications blackout in the camps,[73] but the government refused, continuing to allege "safety" and "security" concerns.[63]

Cyclone Amphan and monsoon fears

edit

In mid-May, Cyclone Amphan developed in the Indian Ocean, and swept up the Bay of Bengal to India and Bangladesh. At its peak, it was the largest cyclone ever recorded in the Bay of Bengal, and its exact point of landfall, and the predicted scope of destruction, was uncertain at first—heightening fears that it could make landfall close to the Rohingya camps, with devastating consequences.[75]

Volunteers, government and aid agencies shored up fragile hillsides and structures to resist the impact.[76] As the eye of the storm approached the mainland, red warning flags were raised at the main Rohingya camps at Cox's Bazar—escalating storm warnings from level six to level nine, the most severe warning.[77] However, Amphan tracked towards the eastern edge of India and western Bangladesh, over a hundred miles from the camps. Heavy rains and high winds from the outer fringes of the storm did limited damage to the camps.[78]

Despite the relatively mild impact of Cyclone Amphan, climatologists warned that Indian Ocean storms had increased in frequency and severity in recent decades.[75] Future monsoon seasons are therefore expected to increase flooding and landslides within the camps.[79][64]

Bhasan Char relocation revived

edit

Though the government continued to urge the relocation of refugees from the camp to the island of Bhasan Char, they faced opposition from global diplomats, human rights, aid organizations, and the Rohingya refugees themselves.

However, in March or April 2020, around 300 Rohingya attempted to flee the mainland camp for Malaysia, by boat, and—after being turned away by Malaysian authorities—became stranded at sea. Though they were rescued by the Bangladesh navy, in early May, the government, rather than return them to the mainland camps from which they had come, instead involuntarily "quarantined" them on Bhashan Char island—ostensibly over the risk that the castaways may have been infected with COVID-19.[80][81]

The same opponents of the Bhasan Char relocation plan urged that the new detainees be returned to their families at the mainland camps as soon as the normal 3-week quarantine period (for COVID-19) was completed. However, despite pleas from human rights organizations and the U.N. Secretary General, Bangladesh's Foreign Minister later announced that the refugees "probably" would not be returned to the mainland camps, until ready to return to Myanmar.[82]

Concerns among their relatives in the camps, and among Rohingya advocates, escalated when Cyclone Amphan approached Bangladesh because the island—which was much closer to the storm than the mainland camps—was known to be prone to complete flooding in major storms.

However, the center of the cyclone passed at a distance of over 40 miles from the island, so it only dealt a minor blow to the island. While no reporters have been allowed on the island, government reports list no deaths or damage to island facilities.[78] Government authorities seized on this news to declare that Bhasan Char's had proved its stability under harsh weather conditions, renewing their relocation campaign.[83][84]

March 2021

edit

In March 2021, a fire at the refugee camp left at least 15 dead, as well as roughly 400 missing and 560 injured. The fire also displaced a total of more than 45,000 mostly Rohingya refugees.[85][86]

March 2023

edit
Main article: 2023 Kutupalong refugee camp fire

In March 2023, a fire at the camp destroyed more than 2,000 shelters and displaced 12,000 refugees.[87]

Administration and operations

edit

During the early stages of the refugee influx, in every camp, a Camp-in-Charge (CIC) official from the Bangladesh's Refugee Relief and Repatriation Commission (RRRC) performed the administrative duties, while the Bangladesh government outsourced responsibilities for recruitment and site management to either the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), or its affiliate organization, the International Organization for Migration (IOM), who led the humanitarian operations, and established a "service map" to guide what services were provided, to and by whom, and where. To fill gaps between the service maps, the agencies responsible for site management provided "referral services" (granting special permissions for movement of Rohingyas), or provided the necessary services themselves.[88]

Overall coordination of their joint efforts, and those of the various aid and management organizations operating in the camps, were handled by their joint Inter-Sector Coordinating Group (ISCG).[88]

Within the camps, all services for Rohingyas were provided by a mix of local, national and international NGOs (non-governmental organizations), along with Bangladesh's Ministry of Women and Children Affairs (MoWCA), and its Department of Social Services (in the Ministry of Social Welfare). District units of all other concerned ministries were also involved in the operations.[88]

According to ISCG, the camps were divided into 16 different sectors, in which the refugees were provided with 11 types of services, including:[88]

  • Site management
  • site development
  • shelter/NFI
  • water/sanitation/hygiene (WASH)
  • food security
  • health
  • education (limited)
  • child protection
  • protection from gender based violence (GBV)
  • communication with community (CwC)[88]

However, in early September 2019 — following Rohingya resistance to the latest repatriation efforts (which the government blamed largely on aid agencies), and with authorities complaining that aid agencies were more sympathetic to the Rohingya than to the Bangladesh government,[88] and were undermining its repatriation and relocation efforts[45][56] — the government announced it was beginning to take charge of all administration in the Rohingya camps, also transferring control of humanitarian operations to RRRC. However, an RRRC Additional Commissioner said that the change was requested by the UNHCR, due to declining funds.[88]

Rohingya refugees, particularly activists, have complained of being denied any role in the management of their camps, and of not even being listened to by authorities and aid workers. Rohingya language is a barrier, but so are the inherent behaviors of aid organizations, according to a 2019 study by the Peace Research Institute Oslo. Additionally, the relations between the Rohingya and the aid agencies broke further when the Bangladesh government ordered an end to direct cash payments to refugees—many of whom, until then, had supplemented their meager resources with cash jobs as "canteer" aid workers for the aid agencies.[89]

Living conditions

edit

In June 2019, researchers with the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) released a report, based on an October 2018 survey of 2,100 Rohingya refugees conducted by IFPRI in conjunction with principal aid and development research agencies, reporting that the Rohingya in the camps were "surviving, not thriving."[90]

The researchers found that the refugees' food supply, though "monotonous" (little meat, dairy products, fruit or vegetables), was of above minimal calorie requirements, and was nearly universally accessible—two thirds of refugees receiving a food parcel consisting of rice, lentils, and nutrient-fortified cooking oil; the other third receiving electronic vouchers that could be used to buy 19 different foods.[90]

However, despite improvements in child nutrition, it found that a third of the children were "chronically undernourished" (and a third of those "acutely" so), owing partly to inadequate nutrition during pregnancy, the "monotonous diets", and inadequate "hygiene conditions in the camps."[90]

Attempts by refugees to earn money, to buy more food, were not very successful, partly because working outside the camps was restricted or forbidden for most, particularly those arriving after August 2017, who were mostly declared "Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals" (FDMNs), denied official "refugee" status.[90]

Rohingya FDMNs who had arrived after August 2017 had a monthly per capita income of US$19—and those who arrived earlier, US$22—compared to Bangladeshi households in the surrounding community, which were 46% higher ($29). While the FDMN's had about 10% of their income from working inside or outside the camps (the rest from their own business, or "other sources"). Those who had lived in Bangladesh longer, got 70% of their income from food assistance, 19% from working, and 2% from businesses of their own.[90]

While acknowledging that the release of Rohingya into the local workforce would suppress income for local Bangladeshis (unless additional aid was supplied to their community), the researchers assessed that it would improve the Rohingyas' condition.[90]

However, in December 2019, the government banned cash aid in the camps, to reduce cash-for-work opportunities—eliminating a rare source of potential income, particularly for women refugees, who had particularly little economic opportunity.[91][89]

In the October 2018 IFPRI survey, children in the camps were not allowed schooling[90] (a situation that authorities have pledged to improve),[92][89] and no training was available to adults, limiting their future prospects.[90][93][89]

The researchers warned that the conditions, if not improved, could turn the camps into sites of "hopelessness, anger or even violence"[90]—a concern echoed by human rights advocates[93] and Rohingya refugees, themselves.[89]

Population table by camp

edit
 
Camp name Population

As of 30 April 2020[94]

Kutupalong RC 16,713
Camp 1E 37,945
Camp 1W 38,005
Camp 2W 23,587
Camp 2E 25,659
Camp 3 35,599
Camp 4 29,854
Camp 4 Ext 6,691
Camp 5 24,437
Camp 6 22,726
Camp 7 36,652
Camp 8E 29,244
Camp 8W 30,683
Camp 9 32,846
Camp 10 29,771
Camp 11 29,668
Camp 12 25,662
Camp 13 41,610
Camp 17 16,344
Camp 18 27,023
Camp 19 22,967
Camp 20 6,777
Camp 20 Ext 7,732
Kutupalong RC & Expention Camps Total 598,195

References

edit
  1. ^ a b "Rohingya Refugee Response Bangladesh: Refugee Population by Location". UNHCR. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  2. ^ Sengupta, Somini; Fountain, Henry (14 March 2018). "The Biggest Refugee Camp Braces for Rain: 'This Is Going to Be a Catastrophe'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  3. ^ "Cyclone Fani hits India, UN moves to protect vulnerable refugees in Bangladesh". UN News. 3 May 2019. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  4. ^ "Coronavirus: Two Rohingya test positive in refugee camp". BBC News. 14 May 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  5. ^ "The young and the hopeless in Bangladesh's camps". UNHCR. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  6. ^ "Rohingya huddled in Bangladesh camps fear plan to move them on". Reuters. 2015. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  7. ^ "Stories from the Rohingya Camps in Bangladesh". 5 September 2016. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  8. ^ Marra, Tatiana. "Diary book - 12 May 2014 - Our work at the Refugee camps near Coxs bazaar". Ikea foundation blog. Ikea foundation. Archived from the original on 8 October 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  9. ^ "Vital UNHCR aid arrives in Cox's Bazar, additional emergency staff deployed". UNHCR USA website. UNHCR. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  10. ^ a b c d e Palma, Porimol; Jinnat, Mohammad Ali (9 September 2017). "From land of death, despair". The Daily Star. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  11. ^ "Cox's Bazar: Kutupalong-Balukhali expansion sites Footpath and Access road as of 05 Dec 2017" (PDF). International Organization for Migration. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
  12. ^ "Bangladesh: Rohingya refugees moved from Kutupalong camp to new site". UNHCR. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  13. ^ "Working at the Rohingya camp". Blog - IKEA Foundation. Archived from the original on 8 October 2018. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  14. ^ "Shelter urgently needed for Rohingya fleeing Myanmar violence". UNHCR. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
  15. ^ "Rohingya children 'beheaded and burned alive' in Burma". The Independent. 3 September 2017. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  16. ^ "Thousands of Rohingya Muslims Stream into Bangladesh Fleeing Violence in Myanmar". NBC News. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  17. ^ Naqvi, Muneeza. "UN: "Alarming number" of 270,000 Rohingya in Myanmar exodus". USA TODAY. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  18. ^ Presse, Agence France (5 October 2017). "Bangladesh to build one of world's largest refugee camps for 800,000 Rohingya". the Guardian. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  19. ^ Judah, Jacob (15 September 2017). "Rohingya influx strains camp resources in Bangladesh". UNHCR. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Retrieved 4 October 2017.
  20. ^ Silver, Marc (18 February 2018). "Kites, Prayers, A Snake Show: Reporting From The Rohingya Camps". NPR. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  21. ^ Refugees, United Nations High Commissioner for. "Monsoon rains highlight needs of Rohingya refugees". UNHCR. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  22. ^ a b c Beech, Hannah (5 September 2019). "A Million Refugees May Soon Lose Their Line to the Outside World". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  23. ^ "Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh on 'precarious ground' ahead of monsoon season," 21 April 2018, CBC News (Canada), retrieved April 2018
  24. ^ a b "Flame fades for Rohingya families amid mud and monsoons in Bangladesh," 6 August 2018, The Guardian, retrieved August 2018
  25. ^ "Bangladesh: Cox's Bazar: Rohingya Refugee Crisis - Cox's Bazaar District: Landslide Hazard - Susceptibility Model Version 1.0 (17 June 2019) - Bangladesh | ReliefWeb". reliefweb.int. 25 June 2019. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  26. ^ "Bangladesh: Rohingya Endure Floods, Landslides; Refugees Awaiting Future Return to Myanmar Need Safer Camps," 5 August 2018, Human Rights Watch, retrieved August 2018
  27. ^ "It created the biggest refugee camp in the world, now the mass deportation of Rohingya will be investigated". ABC News. 14 November 2019. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  28. ^ "Rohingya emergency". UNHCR US. Retrieved 8 August 2024.
  29. ^ a b "Rohingya Settlements: 8,000 acres of forests razed; Expert team of forest ministry estimates Tk 2,420cr environmental loss," 18 October 2019, The Daily Star, retrieved 24 May 2020
  30. ^ a b "Rohingyas rally for elephants: Int'l Day for Biological Diversity observed in Kutupalong camp," 23 May 2018, The Daily Star, retrieved 25 May 2020
  31. ^ Beaubien, Jason (17 April 2019). "U.N. Sets Up Elephant Response Team in Rohingya Refugee Camp: Why Elephants Pose A Threat To Rohingya Refugees". NPR News. Retrieved 17 April 2019.
  32. ^ a b Dorosh, Paul (Dir., Development Strategy & Governance Div., International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)); John Hoddinott (nonresident fellow, IFPRI); and H.E. Babcock, Prof. of Food & Nutrition Economics & Policy, Cornell University. "The Rohingya in Bangladesh are surviving – but their long-term prospects are grim," 25 June 2019, London Daily Telegraph, retrieved June 2019
  33. ^ "Bangladesh sees meth boom amid Rohingya crisis," 20 March 2018, Agence France-Presse in Dhaka Tribune (Bangladesh), retrieved April 2018.
  34. ^ Sheikh Hasina says Rohingya crisis may disrupt stability; Rohingya crisis may disrupt security: PM. Warns Bangladesh’s stability may be at stake if the refugees are not repatriated soon," 27 June 2019, The Daily Star
  35. ^ "The Rohingya children trafficked for sex," 20 March 2018, BBC News retrieved March 2018
  36. ^ a b c "Bangladesh should end restrictions on movement of Rohingya refugees: - Human Rights Watch," 7 September 2019, The Daily Star, retrieved September 2019
  37. ^ "Burma and Bangladesh agree to return hundreds of thousands of Rohingya within two years, despite warnings over camps" 16 January 2018, London Daily Telegraph, retrieved January 2019
  38. ^ "Bangladesh Struggles To Cope With Pressures Of Hosting 1 Million Rohingya Refugees" 15 April 2019, National Public Radio, retrieved April 2019
  39. ^ a b "Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh protest repatriation move," 19 January 2018, Times of India, retrieved January 2018
  40. ^ "Rohingya refugees say they would choose death over repatriation to Myanmar; Nearly all Rohingyas fear for their safety, and do not trust how they will be treated by authorities in Myanmar, if they were to return." 29 November 2018, ABC News retrieved December 2018
  41. ^ "Rohingyas not to return without security, citizenship: -ISCG" 3 December 2018, United News of Bangladesh (same topic in official ISCG report: "ISCG Situation Report (Data Summary): Rohingya Crisis - Cox's Bazar 29 November 2018 (covering 13- 26 November)," retrieved December 2018
  42. ^ "UN chief and rights groups raise concerns over Rohingya deal," 17 January 2018, The Guardian, retrieved January 2019
  43. ^ "Bangladesh: Returning Rohingya to Myanmar illegal and premature" 16 January 2018, Amnesty International, retrieved January 2019
  44. ^ "UN official says not safe yet for Rohingya return to Myanmar," 25 January 2018, Associated Press in U.S. News & World Report (same topic at "Conditions in Myanmar not yet suitable for Rohingya refugees to return safely: UN agency," 23 January 2018, United Nations News Centre), retrieved January 2019
  45. ^ a b c Bangladesh PM attacks Myanmar over Rohingya deadlock," 10 June 2019, Agence France-Presse in Channel NewsAsia (Singapore), retrieved June 2019
  46. ^ "Rohingyas want dialogue with Myanmar first, repatriation later. Without the dialogue, and unless (Myanmar's government in) Naypyidaw meets their demands, the Rohingyas will never opt for repatriation," 25 August 2019, Dhaka Tribune (Bangladesh), retrieved August 2019
  47. ^ "Tens of Thousands of Rohingya Mark 'Genocide Day' Amid Tensions in Bangladesh Camps," 25 August 2019, Reuters News Service in U.S. News & World Report, retrieved 25 May 2020
  48. ^ "Rallies mark two years of exile in Bangladesh.", 25 August 2019, BBC News (same topic at New York Times and Daily Star (Bangladesh)), retrieved August 2019
  49. ^ a b "Foreign minister: Government to take steps to handle future Rohingya rallies," 26 August 2019, United News of Bangladesh in Dhaka Tribune (Bangladesh), retrieved August 2019
  50. ^ "[Bangladesh] Govt probing Aug 25 Rohingya rally, roles of NGOs. 3-member team asked to submit report within 7 working days," 1 September 2019, Dhaka Tribune (Bangladesh), retrieved September 2019
  51. ^ a b Thomas, Elise: "The 'floating' island that has refugees terrified: A disappearing island, cyclone season and 100,000 Rohingya refugees with nowhere else to go. What could go wrong?" 11 April 2019, ABC News, Australian Broadcasting Corporation
  52. ^ a b c "Rohingya Refugees Reject Bangladesh Plan to Move Them to a Remote Island," 27 July 2018, Voice of America, retrieved July 2018
  53. ^ "Human rights group opposes moving Rohingya to island camp," 6 August 2018, Associated Press on ABC News (same topic at: Relocating Rohingya Refugees to a Flood-Prone Island is a Dangerous Idea", 6 August 2018, Washington Post), retrieved August 2018
  54. ^ "UN envoy fears 'new crisis' for Rohingya Muslims if moved to remote Bangladesh island," 12 March 2019, ABC News, Australian Broadcasting Corporationretrieved March 2019
  55. ^ a b "Support Rohingya island relocation or leave the country: - Bangladesh to UN," 5 September 2019, Deutsche Welle (Germany) in The Daily Star, (also: Deutsche Welle, with video of the island) retrieved September 2019
  56. ^ a b "Bangladesh bans two aid agencies from Rohingya refugee camps," 5 September 2019, Agence France-Presse in Channel NewsAsia (Singapore) (same topic in "Bangladesh bans two INGOs for financing, running anti-repatriation campaign among Rohingyas,", 4 September 2019, Dhaka Tribune (Bangladesh)), retrieved September 2019
  57. ^ [https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/rohingya-crisis/2019/09/13/govt-turns-to-barbed-wire-fencing-to-combat-human-trafficking-from-rohingya-camps "Govt turns to barbed-wire fencing to combat human trafficking from Rohingya camps," September 13, 2019 Dhaka Tribune (Bangladesh), retrieved September 2019
  58. ^ "Bangladeshi leader at UN: Rohingya refugee crisis worsening," [warns of emerging 'regional threat'; calls for international involvement], 28 September 2019, Associated Press, retrieved September 2019
  59. ^ a b "Bangladesh Blocks Internet Services in Rohingya Refugee Camps," Reuters News Service in New York Times (same topic at: "No Bangladeshi SIM card for Rohingyas," 3 September 2019 (updated 10 Sept.), The Daily Star, retrieved September 2019
  60. ^ a b "UN human rights office calls for compassion following Rohingya deaths at sea". UN News. 17 April 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  61. ^ a b "Bangladesh: Internet Ban Risks Rohingya Lives". Human Rights Watch. 26 March 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  62. ^ a b "Bangladesh: Joint Letter on COVID19 and Communication Restrictions in the Rohingya Camps," 2 April 2020, Index number: ASA 13/2083/2020, Amnesty International with 49 other aid and rights organizations, (full text: "Re: Restrictions on Communication, Fencing, and COVID-19 in Cox's Bazar District Rohingya Refugee Camps")
  63. ^ a b "Bhasan Char unaffected in Amphan; FM questions aid agencies' opposition. Reminds international community of Rohingya issue's global dimension," 22 May 2020 United News of Bangladesh (UNB), retrieved May 2020
  64. ^ a b Ali, Mayyu, "The world’s largest refugee settlement is in the crosshairs of a cyclone and a pandemic," 21 May 2020 Washington Post, retrieved 25 May 2020
  65. ^ "Fire destroys hundreds of Rohingya shanties in Bangladesh camp," 13 May 2020, Agence France-Presse in Channel NewsAsia, retrieved 26 May 2020
  66. ^ a b c Subbaraman, Nidhi (24 April 2020). "'Distancing is impossible': refugee camps race to avert coronavirus catastrophe". Nature. 581 (7806): 18. Bibcode:2020Natur.581...18S. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-01219-6. PMID 32332908. S2CID 216130809.
  67. ^ "Rohingya refugees at high risk of coronavirus," 19 March 2020, The Daily Star, in Straits Times (Singapore), retrieved 26 May 2020
  68. ^ "Coronavirus panic grips Rohingya camps in Bangladesh," 26 March 2020, Agence France-Presse in Straits Times (Singapore), retrieved 26 May 2020
  69. ^ Truelove et al.: "'The potential impact of COVID-19 in refugee camps in Bangladesh and beyond: A modeling study," 16 June 2020, PlosMed (scientific journal), retrieved 1 August 2020.
  70. ^ a b "Inclusive approach a must to contain coronavirus in Rohingya camps: ISCG," 29 March 2020, New Age (Bangladesh), retrieved 26 May 2020
  71. ^ "Coronavirus: Bangladesh locks down a million in Rohingya camps," 9 April 2020, BBC News, retrieved 26 May 2020
  72. ^ a b "Rohingya camps closed off". The Star. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  73. ^ "First cases of Covid-19 detected in the Rohingya community, two confirmed positive," 14 May 2020, The Daily Star, retrieved 26 May 2020
  74. ^ a b Miller, Judson Jones,Brandon (18 May 2020). "Hurricanes, typhoons and cyclones are becoming stronger, according to a new NOAA study". CNN. Retrieved 9 October 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  75. ^ UNB, Dhaka (20 May 2020). "50 cyclone shelters ready in Cox's Bazar: IOM". The Daily Star. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  76. ^ "Bangladesh moves Rohingya to island shelters as huge cyclone nears". Reuters. 20 May 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  77. ^ a b "Cyclone Amphan Devastates Parts of Bangladesh, West Bengal," 21 May 2020, Benar News, retrieved 25 May 2020
  78. ^ Berlinger, Swati Gupta,Joshua (18 May 2020). "India and Bangladesh are already suffering with coronavirus. Now a super cyclone is heading their way". CNN. Retrieved 9 October 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  79. ^ "Rohingya refugees arrive at 'de facto detention island' in Bangladesh". the Guardian. 8 May 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  80. ^ Report, Star Online (8 May 2020). "280 Rohingyas rescued from Bay of Bengal, moved to Bhashan Char". The Daily Star. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  81. ^ Move Rohingya (boat people) (from) Bangladesh island to refugee camps: UN chief," The Daily Star, retrieved 25 May 2020
  82. ^ Developer), Md Ashequl Morsalin Ibne Kamal(Team Leader)| Niloy Saha(Sr Web Developer)| Shohana Afroz(Web Developer)| Jobayer Hossain(Web. "Bhasan Char unaffected in Amphan; FM questions aid agencies' opposition". unb.com.bd. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  83. ^ "'Bhasan Char among safest places to relocate Rohingyas'". 'Bhasan Char among safest places to relocate Rohingyas' | theindependentbd.com. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  84. ^ "At least 15 killed by huge fire at Rohingya refugee camp in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh". www.cbsnews.com. 24 March 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  85. ^ "UN emergency fund allocates $14 million for Rohingya refugees left homeless by massive fire". UN News. 25 March 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  86. ^ "Bangladesh investigates huge fire at world's largest refugee camp". BBC News. 6 March 2023. Retrieved 6 March 2023.
  87. ^ a b c d e f g "Rohingya crisis: Govt to take over all administrative duties in camps. UNHCR, along with IOM, is helping RRRC to ensure humanitarian assistance to the Rohingyas in 34 camps," 6 September 2019, Dhaka Tribune (Bangladesh), retrieved September 2019
  88. ^ a b c d e Stop ignoring us Rohingya refugees demand role in running camps," 5 February 2020, The Guardian retrieved 25 May 2020
  89. ^ a b c d e f g h i Dorosh, Paul (Dir., Development Strategy & Governance Div., International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)); John Hoddinott (nonresident fellow, IFPRI); and H.E. Babcock, Prof. of Food & Nutrition Economics & Policy, Cornell University: "The Rohingya in Bangladesh are surviving – but their long-term prospects are grim," 25 June 2019, London Daily Telegraph, retrieved June 2019
  90. ^ "Cash ban stokes worry among Rohingya volunteers; 'Women are already not getting enough opportunities. It makes it very hard for them to earn a living,'" 17 December 2019, The New Humanitarian, retrieved December 2019
  91. ^ "Bangladesh to Improve Schools for Rohingya Refugee Children," 29 January 2020, Associated Press in New York Times, retrieved January 2020.
  92. ^ a b Hammadi, Saad (Regional Campaigner for South Asia at Amnesty International)"International Day of Education: A 'lost generation' of Rohingya will have nowhere to go: As the International Court of Justice orders Myanmar to take urgent measures to protect the Rohingya, Amnesty International takes a look at what's at stake for the Rohingya children stranded in Bangladesh,", 29 January 2020, The Daily Star, retrieved January 2020
  93. ^ Joint Government of Bangladesh - Population breakdown as of 30 April 2020
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Kutupalong_refugee_camp&oldid=1258481467"