File talk:Island of Stability.svg

This file is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles

Chemistry

This file is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles

Elements

This file is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this file, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles

New and improved. And in vector format. Apologies for being absent for a few years, and thank you for your patience. --InvaderXan (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

While the diagram itself is nice, it seems a little wonky to me. The "Stable mountains" to the left are labeled as lead to uranium, while it actually seems to cover ytterbium-171 (70p+101n) to bismuth-209 (83p+126n). The radiactives are in the "Deformed nuclei" area, with the leftmost brown one being thorium-232 (90p+142n) and the two next are uranium-235 (92p+143n) and -238 (92p+146n). The last brown one is curium-247 (96p+151n) which is surprisingly stable with a half-life of 15.6 million years. It seems like the proton numbers are off and should be reduced by 10, the red block on the indicated "Island of stability" would then be at 108p+180n (the perspective makes it a little hard to see), while the text indicates 114p, 120p and 126p+184n to be promising candidates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.48.67.188 (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why this is not the correct place to discuss changes to the file seems odd to me. In any case, you are right, the z axis should start at 70, not 80.1812ahill (talk) 18:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Height of the Piles relative to their Stability

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

For the lower stability-colors (RoyalBlue to Orange) each next higher stability-class (or color) causes a pile to grow by one cube.
But the Orange and Red piles are of equal height, followed by the DarkRed one again grown by one cube.

What is the secret behind this peculiarity?

Jaybear (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic