Draft talk:Phil Casey

Inappropriate article

@लॉस एंजिल्स लेखक moved the article to draft at the same time as I did, perhaps 30 seconds earlier. This article is not even close to appropriate for Wikipedia. This is not facebook or linkedin, it is not a place for self-promotional waffle. That he was supervised by Anderson is irrelevant. That he published in a few high profile journals is irrelevant. Note that the editors who review these articles are as knowledgeable in many cases as those who review papers in PRL/Nature etc. Look at other pages and revise, and maybe he will qualify but I doubt it. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:59, 1 January 2025 (UTC)