Draft talk:Linda Litteral

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Curb Safe Charmer in topic Source assessment

Source assessment

edit
Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
SD Voyager   Interview No
The San Diego Union-Tribune (subscription required)   Based on what Litteral wrote and said; very little WP:SECONDARY analysis. Freelance writer - likely paid piece     Fairly substantial piece about her book and exhibition No
Sparks Gallery   Interview No
San Diego Magazine   2 paragraphs announcing exhibition No
Liberty Station   Mere mention No
The San Diego Union-Tribune (subscription required)   Short Q&A (five questions) with Litteral     Announcement of exhibition No
Eugene Scene   Excessively based on what she said   No
California Lawyers for the Arts   Does not mention Litteral No
There San Diego   Mere mention No
OUR Arts Foundation   Litteral most likely provided the bio; video is her talking about herself   No reason to doubt it   Biography, plus 9-minute video where Litteral talks about herself No
SHOUTOUT SOCAL   Interview   No
Issuu   Press release from publisher   No
Herald and News (can't be accessed from Europe)   Says "according to a news release"   6-7 paragraphs announcing an exhibition No
Artillery Magazine   Just an announcement of an exhibition No
WOODTV   Based on what she said No
mlive   2 short paragraphs, one quoting Litteral No
Curating On Campus   Student magazine, but no reason to think this article isn't reliable   No mention of Litteral No
The Power of Expressing Your Feelings Through Art   Article is based on what the gallery director said, and what Litteral said   Student magazine, but no reason to think this article isn't reliable   7 paragraphs No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply