| Submission declined on 11 September 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 15 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Utopes 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 August 2024 by Greenman (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Greenman 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 July 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 4 months ago. | |
Comment: Why has this been resubmitted? A single (close primary) source, once cited, is nowhere near enough to establish notability of any flavour, or even to verify the vast majority of the draft content. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: No external links in the body; Wikipedia should not be used as a way to advertise one's work. Focus only on the information that has been significantly covered by reliable sources in the article. Utopes (talk / cont) 12:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: WP:External links must be removed. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 18:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
 | An editor has marked this as a promising draft because "a film has been made based on one of the subject's novels, which could satisfy WP:AUTHOR #3", and requests that, should it go unedited for six months, G13 deletion be postponed, either by making a dummy/minor edit to the page, or by improving and submitting it for review. Last edited by DoubleGrazing (talk | contribs) 2 months ago. (Update) |  |
Zelda Bezuidenhout is a writer of Afrikaans novels, including youth novels, and radio dramas.
Biography
editZelda Bezuidenhout (née Nel) is a South African author, was born in Zambia and moved to South Africa as a young girl. After obtaining a Bachelor's degree in Communication at the University of the Free State she worked as an advertising copywriter in Johannesburg for most of her adult life. and only started writing Afrikaans novels at the age of 56.
Work
editHer first novel, an Afrikaans youth novel As mens geluk kon proe, was the runner-up in LAPA Publishers Youth Novel competition of 2018. It has since been translated into English and was published as Confessions of a Ginger Pudding in 2021. Her first novel for adults, Die dekonstruksie van Retta Blom, was published in 2019 by NB Publishers[1]and has subsequently been adapted for film. The film premiered at the Silwerskermfees, an Afrikaans film festival, in Cape Town.
Several other Young Adult novels and a suspense novel, Die waarde van stil bure, followed. In 2023, she was once again the runner-up in LAPA Publishers Youth Novel competition with her Young Adult manuscript Quinn se jaar van kwik. The novel is set for publication in October 2024.
Bezuidenhout and a writing partner won the first prize in an Afrikaans audio drama competition with an entry called Koppelkat.
Many of Bezuidenhout’s short stories have been published in anthologies and magazines. She also had a regular column which ran for three years in the ATKV magazine, Taalgenoot.