Submission rejected on 23 December 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Theroadislong 45 hours ago. Last edited by Theroadislong 45 hours ago. |
Submission declined on 23 December 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 46 hours ago. |
Submission declined on 23 December 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 47 hours ago. |
Submission declined on 23 December 2024 by Dan arndt (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Dan arndt 2 days ago. |
Submission declined on 22 December 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 3 days ago. |
Submission declined on 22 December 2024 by WaddlesJP13 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by WaddlesJP13 3 days ago. |
- Comment: No improvement to the sourcing again. A listing on allmusic does not make something notable KylieTastic (talk) 20:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Fails WP:NALBUM needs significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. AllMusic is just a listing of the release not a review of the album. The DogEatDong fansite is not a reliable secondary source. Dan arndt (talk) 01:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Per Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, Discogs has been deemed an unreliable source due to being user-generated content. The official site linked here is a primary source, which may be reliable, and it may be able to be used as a source here, but it cannot verify notability on its own. If you are able to find any news articles or music reviews from independent, reliable sources about this album, those could verify notability. Waddles 🗩 🖉 15:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Warrant | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
EP by | ||||
Released | 1993 | |||
Studio | Nevessa Production, Woodstock, NY | |||
Genre | ||||
Length | 26:06 | |||
Label | Roadrunner | |||
Producer |
| |||
Dog Eat Dog chronology | ||||
|
Warrant is the debut studio EP by American band Dog Eat Dog, released in july 13, 1993 by Roadrunner Records. The album title is a lighthearted jab at the band Warrant for releasing an album titled Dog Eat Dog a year before.
Recording and production
editThe EP was recorded and mixed at Nevessa Production in Woodstock, New York. It was produced, mixed and engineered by Chris Andersen.
Release
editWarrant was released by Roadrunner Records on july 13, 1993 in North America and Europe on Audio cassette, CD and Vinyl.
Track listing
editAll tracks are written by Dog Eat Dog
No. | Title | Length |
---|---|---|
1. | "It's Like That" | 5:15 |
2. | "Dog Eat Dog" | 4:27 |
3. | "World Keeps Spinnin'" | 3:05 |
4. | "... In The Dog House" | 4:39 |
5. | "Psychorama" | 4:21 |
6. | "... In The Dog House (Dog Pound Remix)" | 4:19 |
Total length: | 26:06 |
Personnel
editDog Eat Dog
- John Connor - Vocals
- Dan Nastasi - Guitar, Vocals
- Sean Kilkenny - Guitar
- Dave Neabore - Bass, Vocals
- Dave Maltby - Drums
Additional musicians
- Doug Wilson - Vocals for "In The Dog House"
- Scott Mueller - Saxophone
- Kevin Reilly - Additional backup vocals
Production
- Dan Nastasi - Production
- Chris Andersen - Production, mixing, engineering
- Dog Eat Dog - Production
- Chris Gehringer - Mastering (at The Hit Factory)
- Doug Wilson - Production, mixing ("... In The Dog House (Dog Pound Remix)")
- Dave Maltby - Co-Production ("... In The Dog House (Dog Pound Remix)")