Submission declined on 13 September 2024 by Ldm1954 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 30 May 2024 by Liance (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Liance 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 17 May 2024 by Jamiebuba (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Jamiebuba 6 months ago. | |
Comment: There is not enough in this article to demonstrate notability. I don't see a strong publication record, and no major international awards. The sources are all Chinese, and do not demonstrate an international reputation. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Promotional tone still not addressed from previous declines and is pervasive throughout article ~Liancetalk 18:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Qiu Aici (Chinese: 邱爱慈; November 22, 1941 - present) is a scientist in the field of high-current pulsed particle beam accelerators and high-power pulse technology in China.[1] She is an Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering, a researcher, doctoral supervisor, and chief engineer at the Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, and the dean of the School of Electrical Engineering at Xi’an Jiaotong University. [2]
Qiu Aici participated in the development and improvement of China’s first high-impedance electron beam accelerator. She was also responsible for the development of China’s low-impedance pulsed electron beam accelerator “Flash No. 2” with the strongest beam current of 1MA. Moreover, she presided over many other scientific research projects including “Qiangguang No. 1”, “Fast Z-Pinch Physics and Its Pulse Power Driving Source Technology” and “High-Power Ion Beam Generation and Application.”[2]
Early Life
editQiu Aici was born on November 22, 1941 in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province. [1]Qiu Aici’s father was an employee of the Shaoxing County Taxation Bureau and her mother was a housewife. Before Qiu Aici was born, her father was dead. Her mother raised her and her two sisters. In 1953, Qiu Aici was admitted to Zhejiang Provincial Hangzhou Girls’ Middle School. With the help of national scholarships and her sisters, she finished junior high school and was recommended to high school;[3] then, she was admitted to Xi’an Jiaotong University in 1960.
Career
editAfter graduating from college in 1964, Qiu Aici was assigned to work at the Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology.[3] Then, in 1971, she was appointed as the technical leader of the high-impedance pulsed electron beam accelerator project of the Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology; in 1978, she was the youngest Deputy Director in the Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology. From 1993 to 1998, Qiu Aici served as deputy chief engineer at the institute, in charge of pre-research, equipment, and laboratory construction.[3] Due to her contribution to national defense, Qiu Aici was awarded the rank of major general in 1997.[4] In 1999, she was elected as an Academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering;[1] in 2005, she became the Dean of the School of Electrical Engineering of Xi’an Jiaotong University.[3]
Beginning in 1982, with support from Academicians Cheng Kaijia and Lu Min, Qiu Aici took on the task of developing “two 0.9 (0.9MV, 0.9MA) high-current pulsed relativistic electron beam equipment”; it is a scientific and engineering project. During this time, she was hospitalized for 107 days due to overwork; the development plan report was completed from the hospital. This equipment is later named as the “Flash II” accelerator. The “Flash II” accelerator positions China as the fourth country to have this high technology after the United States, Russia, and the United Kingdom.[4]
In 2022, Qiu Aici received the Shaanxi Provincial Highest Science and Technology Award. That same year, she also received the second prize in the National Teaching Achievement Award for Higher Education (Graduate Students).[1]
References
edit- ^ a b c d "Qiu Aici's Page". Chinese Academy of Engineering. Retrieved 2024-05-16.
- ^ a b "Faculty Profile". Xi’an Jiaotong University. Retrieved 2024-05-16.
- ^ a b c d "Interview with Qiu Aici" (PDF). Chinese Academy of Engineering. 2013-05-21. Retrieved 2024-05-16.
- ^ a b Pan, Qiongying (27 March 2008). "'Woman General' Academician Qiu Aici – An interview with academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and experts in high-power pulse technology and high-current electron beam accelerators". Shaoxing Daily. Retrieved 2024-05-16.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.