Submission declined on 17 January 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 17 January 2025 by Bkissin (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Bkissin 6 days ago. |
Submission declined on 14 January 2025 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 8 days ago. |
Submission declined on 8 January 2025 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 14 days ago. |
Submission declined on 8 January 2025 by Beachweak (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Beachweak 15 days ago. |
- Comment: Additionally, failed candidate does not meet WP:NPOL Bkissin (talk) 15:08, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: There's no pass on the notability test for politicians or lawyers. We also do not want things like
His articulate and passionate commentary has made him a respected voice
in the biography of living persons. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: All content in BLPs needs to be accompanied with citations of reliable, secondary sources. Additionally, taking a quick look at the references listed, websites such as Instagram, Twitter/X and personal websites are usually not acceptable as sources as they are made up of user-generated content. Beachweak (talk) 13:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Jack Lombardi II | |
---|---|
Personal details | |
Born | Oak Lawn, Illinois, U.S. | May 15, 1977
Political party | Republican |
Spouse | Sharon |
Children | 3 |
Education | Northwestern Business College |
Profession | Lawyer, politician |
Jack Lombardi II was born on May 15, 1977, in Oak Lawn, Illinois. He attended St. Laurence High School and later studied at Northwestern Business College. Growing up in the Midwest instilled in him a strong work ethic and community values, which he credits as the foundation of his entrepreneurial and political pursuits.
Ideology and Public Engagement
editLombardi has been involved in political campaigns and discussions on conservative topics, with a focus on personal responsibility and limited government, as noted in local reporting.
Political Career
editCongressional Campaigns Lombardi entered politics as a Republican candidate for Illinois's 14th congressional district in 2022 and 2024. Although he did not secure the Republican Party nomination in either race, his campaigns emphasized conservative values, including free speech, American energy independence, and reducing government regulation.
Advocacy and Public Commentary
editIn addition to campaigning, Lombardi is a political commentator who frequently addresses national issues, such as big tech censorship and economic policy. His opinions have been featured on various media platforms.
Personal Life
editJack Lombardi is married and has three children. A lifelong martial artist, he is trained in boxing and mixed martial arts, reflecting his dedication to discipline and personal growth. Ideology and Public Engagement
Lombardi's career reflects a commitment to promoting conservative ideals, including personal responsibility and limited government. Through his work as an entrepreneur, political candidate, and commentator, he seeks to engage with the public on national and community issues.
References
edit- ^ "Jack Lombardi II: 2022 candidate for U.S. House 14th District". Daily Herald. May 28, 2022.
- ^ "Jack Lombardi II | BallotReady". www.ballotready.org. June 28, 2022.
- ^ "Jack Lombardi II | Election". news.wttw.com.
- ^ "Jack Lombardi II".
- ^ Gonzales, Bree. "Lombardi: 'One of the main issues we're having as conservatives is being silenced online'". Will County Gazette.