Chojoongdong (Korean: 조중동, Korean pronunciation: [tɕodʑuŋdoŋ]), abbreviated as CJD, is a pejorative term[1] which refers to three highly circulated conservative newspapers in South Korea.[1] The word is an acronym of The Chosun Ilbo, JoongAng Ilbo and The Dong-A Ilbo newspapers, and the grouping is seen as forming the basis of South Korea's conservative media.[1]

Chojoongdong
Hangul
조중동
Hanja
朝中東
Revised RomanizationJojungdong
McCune–ReischauerChojungdong

The term was used by The Hankyoreh editor Jung Yeonju (정연주) in October 2000.[2] Korean liberals and progressives criticize Chojoongdong primarily because of their conservative-biased editorial stances and doing business in a collusive and surreptitious manner.[citation needed] Since 2008, some critics of CJD have claimed that there is a close relationship between CJD and the Lee Myung-bak government.[3]

As of 2010, the market share of Chosun, Joong-ang and Dong-a Ilbo is 24.3%, 21.8%, and 18.3%, respectively.[4] Nearly 58% of printed newspaper subscribers in South Korea read one of the three daily news.[5][6] In December 2011, Chosun Ilbo opened their own cable news network.[7]

Criticisms

edit

Opponents of the three major newspapers credit them with a disproportionate degree of influence and power, to the extent that they believe that simply abolishing them would unleash major positive changes (one of the most prominent anti-newspaper organizations is called "Beautiful World Without Chojoongdong").[8] Although the major newspapers are private organisations, and are competitors with each other, they are nevertheless considered by their opponents to be a monolithic, quasi-governmental organization. Criticism stems from their previous history of collaboration with Japan in the Japanese occupation of 1910–1945. (the JoongAng Ilbo, however did not exist during the Japanese occupation),[9] as well as their collaboration with domestic authoritarian rule before the democratic transition in 1987.[10]

Censorship

edit

Some critics say CJD newspapers have conservative tendencies of censoring news unfavorable to the conservative Lee Myung-bak government. Jung Woon-hyun accused the three newspapers of censoring WikiLeaks-related articles that is alleged to have exposed negative issues under President Lee Myung-bak's administrative influence.[11][unreliable source?] It has also broadcast the court decisions that acquitted MBC's PD Note and its episode on 2008 Beef protests, but agreed that false information was in the episode.[12][13]

Accusation of strategic marriages

edit

Opponents believe that CJD have joined with the business world through strategic marriages,[14][15] making their articles biased towards capital.

Pro Korea-U.S. Free Trade agreement

edit

There was some criticism that three CJD newspapers simultaneously presented articles about the danger of negative Free Trade Agreement rumors on the South Korea–United States Free Trade Agreement among South Korean social network service users, particularly on Twitter.[16]

Promotion of English

edit

The CJD newspapers were noted to be active agents in the promotion of the English language in South Korea.[1]

Anti-CJD movements

edit

"Anti-CJD sentiment" has existed in the past. However, in 2008, during the mad cow protests over US beef imports that were feared to cause variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, the major newspapers showed a favourable attitude towards market opening and reported negatively on the Candlelight Revolution. This opposition temporarily stimulated a boycott movement.[17][unreliable source?] Protesters attacked and vandalised the buildings of the three major newspapers, and CJD newspapers claim that some of their employees were harassed.[18][19]

Boycott movement

edit

During the mad cow protests, Internet activists launched a movement to boycott advertisers who put advertisements in those newspapers. They shared a list of advertisers on the Internet, and then pressured advertisers by launching a harassment campaign via telephone or mail.[20]

On February 19, 2009, the court found guilty some activists who organised and ran the boycott, sentencing them to 10 months in jail (on a two-year suspended sentence) or fines. The defendants have indicated that they will launch an appeal.[21]

edit

The South Korean television comedy program, Gag Concert, lampooned the CJD media establishments as turfs by gangsters who comply with the regulations of the Korea Communications Commission in the skit, War On Television (방송과의 전쟁).[22]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d Ricento, Thomas, ed. (2 February 2015). Language Policy and Political Economy: English in a Global Context (2015 ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 175. ISBN 978-0-19-936339-1. Retrieved 6 February 2018.
  2. ^ Kim Sang-chul (김상철) (December 10, 2003). 조중동서 중앙 분리 글쎄요. Kyunghyang Shinmun (in Korean). Retrieved April 11, 2012.
  3. ^ Editorial (January 7, 2009). "Media war". The Korea Herald. Archived from the original on February 23, 2012. Retrieved April 11, 2012. Supporters of the opposition claim there is an "evil" collusion between the government and major newspapers under the guise of adapting to new communications technology.
  4. ^ Noam, Eli M. (2016). Who Owns the World's Media?: Media Concentration and Ownership Around the World. Oxford University Press. p. 828. ISBN 978-0-19-998723-8. Retrieved 6 February 2018.
  5. ^ Jang Woo-sung (장우성) (July 2, 2008). 조중동 구독점유율 58%. Journalists Association of Korea (in Korean). Archived from the original on July 22, 2011. Retrieved April 11, 2012.
  6. ^ Son Bong-seok (손봉석) (June 30, 2008). 조·중·동 신문시장 점유율 50%대로 떨어져. Kyunghyang Shinmun (in Korean). Retrieved April 11, 2012.
  7. ^ English Chosun.com (November 30, 2011). "TV Chosun to Start Broadcasting Thursday". The Chosun Ilbo. Retrieved April 11, 2012.
  8. ^ Beautiful World Without Chosun Ilbo"
  9. ^ "조·중·동 왜곡 보도를 한 눈에"… '리얼 조중동'. 9 June 2008.
  10. ^ Kim, Chunhyo (26 February 2016). Samsung, Media Empire and Family: A Power Web. p. 71. ISBN 9781317362937. Retrieved 6 February 2018.
  11. ^ Jung (정), Un-hyeong (운형) (2011-09-19). 위키리크스가 폭로한 '친미 관료·기자들' 한나라당·조중동은 왜 이 사건 침묵하나. OhmyNews (in Korean). Archived from the original on 2012-04-03. Retrieved 2011-10-14.
  12. ^ Kwon (권), Sun-taek (순택) (2011-09-04). 법원은 'PD수첩' 무죄라는데, 조중동은?. Medius (in Korean). Retrieved 2011-10-17.
  13. ^ Park (박), Sang-hui (상희) (2010-12-18). 평범하게 살려고 했는데, MB와 조중동이 안 도와주대요. 민중의 소리 (in Korean). Retrieved 2011-10-17.
  14. ^ 조중동은 한집안?. 29 July 2005.
  15. ^ 얽히고 설킨 조중동 족벌 혼맥과 세습경영 - 미디어스. Archived from the original on 2011-07-22. Retrieved 2009-04-24.
  16. ^ Cho (조), Su-gyeong (수경) (2011-11-14). "트위터는 괴담 진원지" 조중동 공격 이유 있었네. Media Today (in Korean). Retrieved 2011-11-19.
  17. ^ 촛불들의 '경향·한겨레 구독운동', 들불처럼 번져 - 오마이뉴스. Archived from the original on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2009-04-24.
  18. ^ English Chosun.com (June 27, 2008). "Chosun Ilbo Attacked as Street Violence Escalates". Retrieved April 11, 2012.
  19. ^ "South Korea: Journalist Assaulted in Demonstration". Archived from the original on 2011-07-27.
  20. ^ "dailyseop". Archived from the original on 2015-09-23. Retrieved 2009-04-29.
  21. ^ [1][permanent dead link]
  22. ^ Koh (고), Min-seo (민서) (2012-03-26). 개콘 '방송과의 전쟁', 깨알풍자로 인기 예감. OBS News (in Korean). Retrieved 2012-04-04.
edit