The Anton Chico Formation is a geologic formation exposed in New Mexico that was deposited in the Anisian Age of the middle Triassic Period.[1]
Anton Chico Formation | |
---|---|
Stratigraphic range: | |
Type | Formation |
Underlies | Santa Rosa Formation |
Overlies | Artesia Group |
Thickness | 102 feet (31 m) |
Lithology | |
Primary | Sandstone |
Other | Mudstone, Conglomerate |
Location | |
Coordinates | 35°12′28″N 105°08′35″W / 35.2078°N 105.1431°W |
Region | New Mexico |
Country | United States |
Type section | |
Named for | Anton Chico, New Mexico |
Named by | Lucas and Hunt |
Year defined | 1987 |
Description
editThe formation consists mostly of very fine to medium-grained, red-brown to gray-red sandstone with minor silty mudstone and conglomerate, including a basal conglomerate bed. The total thickness of the formation is 22.1 meters (73 ft) at the type section. The formation is exposed along the Pecos River as far south as Santa Rosa, New Mexico.[1]
The formation is overlain by the Santa Rosa Formation and lies on the Artesia Group.[2]
Fossils
editThe Anton Chico Formation was originally correlated with the Holbrook Member of the Moenkopi Formation based on the finding of Eocyclotosaurus in the formation. The formation also contains the trace fossil Isopodichnus and traces of actinopterygian fish in coprolites. Amphibian fossils are abundant and diverse. These include fragments of paracyclotosaurid fossils, possibly related to Stanocephalosaurus, and an unidentified capitosauroid. Reptile fossils are more common and diverse than in the Holbrook Member and include erythrosuchids, other archosaurs, rauisuchians, and prolacertiforms.[3] The formation has also yielded two incomplete skeletons of a large archosaur[4] and the primitive poposauroid Arizonasaurus babbitti.[5]
History of investigation
editThe beds making up this formation were originally the lowest informal member of the Santa Rosa Formation, but were designated as the Anton Chico Formation by Spencer G. Lucas and Adrian Hunt in 1987.[1] Lucas and Hunt subsequently reduced the unit to member rank within the Moenkopi Formation,[2][3] but its inclusion in the Moenkopi has not been universally accepted.[6] Some red beds previously mapped as Bernal Formation, particularly in its more northern and western exposures, are now thought to belong to the Anton Chico.[7]
References
editBibliography
edit- Boy, JA; Schoch, RR; Lucas, SG (2001). "The Moenkopi Formation in east-central New Mexico: stratigraphy and vertebrate fauna" (PDF). New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook. 52: 103–109. Retrieved September 17, 2020.
- Lehman, T.M. (1994). "The saga of the Dockum Group and the case of the Texas/New Mexico boundary fault" (PDF). New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Bulletin. 150: 37–51. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
- Lucas, S.G.; Hayden, S.N. (1991). "Type section of the Permian Bernal Formation and the Permian-Triassic boundary in north-central New Mexico" (PDF). New Mexico Geology. 13 (1): 9–15. Retrieved November 3, 2021.
- Lucas, S.G.; Hunt, A.P. (1987). "Stratigraphy of the Anton Chico and Santa Rosa Formations, Triassic of east-central New Mexico". Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Journal. 22 (1): 21–33. JSTOR 40024381. Retrieved September 17, 2020.
- Lucas, S.G.; Hunt, A.P. (1989). "Revised Triassic stratigraphy in the Tucumcari basin, east-central New Mexico". In Lucas, S.G.; Hunt, A.P. (eds.). Dawn of the age of dinosaurs in the American southwest. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 150–170. Retrieved September 17, 2020.
- Schoch, Rainer R.; Nesbitt, Sterling Müller; Lucas, Spencer G.; Boy, Jürgen A. (March 1, 2010). "The reptile assemblage from the Moenkopi Formation (Middle Triassic) of New Mexico". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 255 (3): 345–369. doi:10.1127/0077-7749/2009/0030.
- Nesbitt, Sterling J.; Lucas, Spencer G.; Schoch, Rainer R. (2006). "A new, large archosauriform from the Anton Chico Member of the upper Moenkopi Formation (Middle Triassic), east-central New Mexico, USA". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 239 (2): 289–311. doi:10.1127/njgpa/239/2006/289.