A referendum on the system of government was held in Nepal on 2 May 1980. Voters were offered the choice between a non-partisan panchayat system and a multi-party system. The panchayat system received a slim majority of 54.99%, whereas Multi-Party System only received 45.2% of the total votes. Voter turnout was 66.9%.[1]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Results by district
|
Background
editWith the backdrop of mass student protests against his rule in the spring of 1979, King Birendra made a public declaration on May 23, 1979, that a referendum with universal adult suffrage with secret vote would be held in which the people of Nepal would be able to choose between introducing a multiparty system or retain the non-party panchayat regime.[2]
On 21 January 1980, King Birendra published the Referendum Rules, stating that after the referendum 'His Majesty shall make such provisions in the Constitution of Nepal as may deem necessary'.[3]
Method of voting
editNepalese citizens aged 21 and above were eligible to vote.[4] The voters would mark their choice by stamping either of two colours on the ballot paper, blue for the multiparty system and yellow for the non-party panchayat system. It was speculated at the time that the choice of colours had not been coincidental, since the yellow colour was associated with saintly religious qualities. There is no empirical evidence though, that the choice of colours affected the outcome of the vote.[5]
Results
editChoice | Votes | % |
---|---|---|
Panchayat | 2,433,452 | 54.79 |
Multi-party | 2,007,965 | 45.21 |
Invalid/blank votes | 372,069 | – |
Total | 4,813,486 | 100 |
Registered voters/turnout | 7,192,451 | 66.92 |
Source: Nohlen et al., Rishikesh, sudd.ch |
By region
editChoice | Hills | Inner-Tarai | Mountains | Plains | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | |
Panchayat | 1,126,169 | 57.2 | 87,895 | 34.0 | 228,617 | 71.1 | 848,754 | 44.6 |
Multi-party | 844,124 | 42.8 | 139,021 | 66.0 | 86,658 | 28.9 | 938,162 | 55.4 |
Invalid/blank votes | 158,581 | – | 20,645 | – | 25,061 | – | 69,041 | – |
Total | 2,127,615 | 100 | 278,780 | 100 | 340,338 | 100 | 2,066,753 | 100 |
Source: Rishikesh |
By district
editThe panchayat partyless system option got a majority in 54 out of the 75 districts of Nepal. The highest percentage of pro-panchayat votes was recorded in Dolpo (96.4%), the lowest in Bhaktapur (34.4%). The highest scores for the multiparty system option were recorded in Bhaktapur (65.6%), Udaipur (65.1%), Siraha (64%) and Bardiya (62.1%). In general, the multiparty system option performed better in areas with higher literacy levels.
District | Electorate | Turnout | Invalid votes | Votes | Proportion of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Panchayat | Multiparty | Panchayat | Multiparty | |||||
Jhapa District | 168,184 | 81.61% | 10,721 | 72,337 | 54,198 | 57.17% | 42.83% | |
Ilam District | 76,142 | 77.26% | 5,459 | 28,525 | 24,841 | 53.45% | 46.55% | |
Panchthar District | 71,514 | 73.78% | 2,797 | 28,442 | 21,523 | 56.92% | 43.08% | |
Taplejung District | 56,785 | 59.83% | 3,368 | 17,597 | 13,012 | 57.49% | 42.51% | |
Morang District | 208,774 | 79.37% | 14,737 | 72,589 | 78,382 | 48.08% | 51.92% | |
Sunsari District | 152,000 | 82.17% | 11,353 | 54,853 | 58,696 | 48.31% | 51.69% | |
Dhankuta District | 61,483 | 71.61% | 2,269 | 31,496 | 10,265 | 75.42% | 24.58% | |
Bhojpur District | 100,289 | 60.45% | 3,595 | 37,083 | 19,951 | 65.02% | 34.98% | |
Tehrathum District | 47,390 | 64.95% | 1,696 | 18,171 | 10,912 | 62.48% | 37.52% | |
Sankhuwasabha District | 68,190 | 61.77% | 3,021 | 25,560 | 13,542 | 65.37% | 34.63% | |
Siraha District | 196,875 | 79.37% | 15,652 | 50,543 | 90,065 | 35.95% | 64.05% | |
Saptari District | 197,303 | 76.82% | 10,189 | 71,053 | 70,322 | 50.26% | 49.74% | |
Udayapur District | 68,730 | 56.47% | 3,289 | 12,393 | 23,133 | 34.88% | 65.12% | |
Okhaldhunga District | 69,351 | 58.43% | 1,848 | 27,062 | 11,614 | 69.97% | 30.03% | |
Khotang District | 107,064 | 60.83% | 2,276 | 46,576 | 16,270 | 74.11% | 25.89% | |
Solukhumbu District | 44,816 | 62.94% | 1,522 | 20,224 | 6,461 | 75.79% | 24.21% | |
Sarlahi District | 197,396 | 72.85% | 6,510 | 58,409 | 78,889 | 42.54% | 57.46% | |
Dhanusha District | 207,695 | 76.49% | 16,545 | 74,796 | 67,520 | 52.56% | 47.44% | |
Mahottari District | 187,552 | 72.99% | 7,509 | 70,881 | 58,498 | 54.79% | 45.21% | |
Sindhuli District | 79,328 | 59.75% | 1,012 | 27,308 | 19,077 | 58.87% | 41.13% | |
Ramechhap District | 86,397 | 52.17% | 2,622 | 24,930 | 17,522 | 58.73% | 41.27% | |
Dolakha District | 82,912 | 50.57% | 2,164 | 27,987 | 11,781 | 70.38% | 29.62% | |
Dhading District | 121,875 | 53.79% | 4,051 | 39,932 | 21,572 | 64.93% | 35.07% | |
Nuwakot District | 100,679 | 61.45% | 8,886 | 40,486 | 12,500 | 76.41% | 23.59% | |
Rasuwa District | 15,423 | 85.30% | 713 | 9,289 | 3,154 | 74.65% | 25.35% | |
Kathmandu District | 219,968 | 72.73% | 7,956 | 68,140 | 83,884 | 44.82% | 55.18% | |
Lalitpur District | 85,189 | 78.82% | 3,631 | 24,472 | 39,043 | 38.53% | 61.47% | |
Bhaktapur District | 76,116 | 80.26% | 2,814 | 21,346 | 36,928 | 36.63% | 63.37% | |
Kavrepalanchok District | 149,697 | 58.00% | 6,515 | 49,230 | 31,084 | 61.30% | 38.70% | |
Sindhupalchok District | 119,736 | 57.27% | 4,490 | 43,269 | 20,808 | 67.53% | 32.47% | |
Makwanpur District | 104,732 | 61.39% | 3,896 | 34,960 | 25,443 | 57.88% | 42.12% | |
Chitwan District | 105,889 | 72.52% | 5,842 | 31,219 | 39,731 | 44.00% | 56.00% | |
Bara District | 146,919 | 76.49% | 5,827 | 63,114 | 43,441 | 59.23% | 40.77% | |
Parsa District | 141,841 | 72.12% | 8,343 | 63,862 | 30,091 | 67.97% | 32.03% | |
Rautahat District | 168,083 | 71.52% | 6,526 | 54,389 | 59,294 | 47.84% | 52.16% | |
Tanahun District | 110,052 | 62.50% | 6,384 | 24,156 | 38,243 | 38.71% | 61.29% | |
Gorkha District | 114,686 | 63.63% | 4,857 | 43,567 | 24,556 | 63.95% | 36.05% | |
Lamjung District | 76,892 | 68.40% | 3,708 | 24,939 | 23,950 | 51.01% | 48.99% | |
Kaski District | 111,221 | 67.76% | 5,579 | 30,012 | 39,769 | 43.01% | 56.99% | |
Syangja District | 148,939 | 64.98% | 8,632 | 46,205 | 41,941 | 52.42% | 47.58% | |
Manang District | 3,960 | 90.18% | 35 | 3,043 | 493 | 86.06% | 13.94% | |
Rupandehi District | 163,347 | 71.17% | 9,380 | 52,664 | 54,204 | 49.28% | 50.72% | |
Nawalparasi District | 128,456 | 73.39% | 7,159 | 47,275 | 39,842 | 54.27% | 45.73% | |
Kapilvastu District | 136,312 | 75.09% | 6,908 | 49,751 | 45,700 | 52.12% | 47.88% | |
Gulmi District | 128,168 | 63.13% | 8,904 | 36,279 | 35,735 | 50.38% | 49.62% | |
Arghakhanchi District | 79,900 | 56.53% | 3,001 | 21,812 | 20,356 | 51.73% | 48.27% | |
Palpa District | 101,930 | 63.52% | 3,956 | 26,961 | 33,831 | 44.35% | 55.65% | |
Parbat District | 80,165 | 62.25% | 2,128 | 30,831 | 16,945 | 64.53% | 35.47% | |
Myagdi District | 47,755 | 69.59% | 1,149 | 21,036 | 11,049 | 65.56% | 34.44% | |
Mustang District | 7,924 | 87.06% | 321 | 5,898 | 680 | 89.66% | 10.34% | |
Baglung District | 113,046 | 63.94% | 5,712 | 45,059 | 21,516 | 67.68% | 32.32% | |
Humla District | 34,920 | 78.69% | 1,857 | 21,518 | 4,102 | 83.99% | 16.01% | |
Jumla District | 11,480 | 71.04% | 617 | 4,783 | 2,755 | 63.45% | 36.55% | |
Dolpa District | 11,518 | 91.86% | 984 | 9,261 | 336 | 96.50% | 3.50% | |
Mugu District | 21,357 | 76.89% | 1,222 | 12,844 | 2,356 | 84.50% | 15.50% | |
Kalikot District | 44,694 | 77.76% | 4,029 | 26,211 | 4,516 | 85.30% | 14.70% | |
Dang District | 113,070 | 62.58% | 6,283 | 29,173 | 35,303 | 45.25% | 54.75% | |
Salyan District | 72,133 | 55.37% | 3,117 | 21,755 | 15,070 | 59.08% | 40.92% | |
Pyuthan District | 77,308 | 58.12% | 2,666 | 30,245 | 12,019 | 71.56% | 28.44% | |
Rolpa District | 85,147 | 52.84% | 3,599 | 28,983 | 12,408 | 70.02% | 29.98% | |
Rukum District | 62,453 | 56.84% | 6,099 | 19,919 | 9,478 | 67.76% | 32.24% | |
Banke District | 90,331 | 73.91% | 7,856 | 37,769 | 21,138 | 64.12% | 35.88% | |
Bardiya District | 74,220 | 80.83% | 9,353 | 19,192 | 31,448 | 37.90% | 62.10% | |
Surkhet District | 66,216 | 67.83% | 4,119 | 19,021 | 21,777 | 46.62% | 53.38% | |
Dailekh District | 80,877 | 55.56% | 3,843 | 26,357 | 14,739 | 64.14% | 35.86% | |
Jajarkot District | 46,392 | 61.44% | 7,667 | 11,805 | 9,033 | 56.65% | 43.35% | |
Kailali District | 109,638 | 59.32% | 10,225 | 27,703 | 27,104 | 50.55% | 49.45% | |
Doti District | 81,663 | 41.36% | 3,080 | 15,135 | 15,559 | 49.31% | 50.69% | |
Achham District | 106,712 | 47.25% | 3,849 | 28,350 | 18,226 | 60.87% | 39.13% | |
Bajhang District | 65,947 | 58.41% | 2,486 | 25,325 | 10,707 | 70.28% | 29.72% | |
Bajura District | 37,215 | 58.30% | 1,557 | 14,416 | 5,723 | 71.58% | 28.42% | |
Kanchanpur District | 72,321 | 58.02% | 4,248 | 18,382 | 19,330 | 48.74% | 51.26% | |
Dadeldhura District | 45,600 | 47.89% | 2,308 | 9,235 | 10,296 | 47.28% | 52.72% | |
Baitadi District | 92,377 | 38.80% | 2,287 | 18,308 | 15,245 | 54.56% | 45.44% | |
Darchula District | 43,772 | 52.24% | 1,167 | 14,661 | 7,040 | 67.56% | 32.44% | |
Source: Election Commission |
The Hindu community was more or less evenly divided between the two options. The Muslim community is said to have voted predominantly in favour of the panchayat system. Ethnic groups like Tamang, Sherpa, Magar, Gurung and Kirati overwhelmingly supported the panchayat option, whilst the Tharu are said to have been predominantly in favour of the multiparty system.[6]
References
edit- ^ Dieter Nohlen, Florian Grotz & Christof Hartmann (2001) Elections in Asia: A data handbook, Volume I, p633 ISBN 0-19-924958-X
- ^ Shaha, Rishikesh. Politics in Nepal 1980-1990. New Delhi: Manohar Publications, 1990. p. 51, 69.
- ^ Shaha, Rishikesh. Politics in Nepal 1980-1990. New Delhi: Manohar Publications, 1990. p. 62.
- ^ Shaha, Rishikesh. Politics in Nepal 1980-1990. New Delhi: Manohar Publications, 1990. p. 80.
- ^ Shaha, Rishikesh. Politics in Nepal 1980-1990. New Delhi: Manohar Publications, 1990. p. 68-69.
- ^ Shaha, Rishikesh. Politics in Nepal 1980-1990. New Delhi: Manohar Publications, 1990. p. 69-70.