Yang Xiuqing (simplified Chinese: 杨秀清; traditional Chinese: 楊秀清; pinyin: Yáng Xiùqīng; Wade–Giles: Yang Hsiu-Ch'ing) (died September 2/3, 1856), was an organizer and commander-in-chief of the Taiping Rebellion.
Yang Xiuqing 楊秀清 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
East King (東王) | |||||
East King of the Heavenly Kingdom | |||||
Reign | 1851–1856 | ||||
Successor | Hong Tianyou | ||||
Heavenly King | Hong Xiuquan | ||||
Born | Yang Silong (楊嗣龍) September 23, 1821 Xincun, Guiping, Guangxi, Qing China | ||||
Died | September 2, 1856 Tianjing, Taiping Heavenly Kingdom (modern Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) | (aged 34)||||
| |||||
Father | Yang Yaqi (楊亞齊) | ||||
Mother | Gu Shi (古氏) | ||||
Religion | God Worshipping Society | ||||
Military career | |||||
Allegiance | Taiping Heavenly Kingdom | ||||
Battles / wars | Taiping Rebellion |
Early life
editYang Xiuqing's family were farmers from Xincun near Jintian, Guangxi, but he lost his parents at a young age.[1] According to imperial reports, Yang was a charcoal burner with some education who later organized a convoy system used to protect merchandise that was being transported through the area from bandits.[2] His brother Yang Fuqing[dubious – discuss] also later became a Taiping military commander.[3][better source needed]
Society of God-Worshippers
editIn April 1848, while Feng Yunshan and Hong Xiuquan were in a neighboring province, Yang assumed a leadership role in the God-Worshipping Society.[4] Yang claimed to have been stricken deaf and mute only to have regained his hearing and speech at a meeting of the God Worshippers.[5] He began to claim that he could enter trances in which he would be possessed by the Holy Spirit, allowing God the Father to speak through him.[6] It does not appear that Yang truly believed that this was occurring, but that he instead acted as such in service of his own ambitions, as while speaking as God Feng necessarily possessed greater authority than even Hong Xiuquan.[7] Upon Hong and Feng's return in the summer of 1849, they investigated Yang's claims and recognized them as genuine.[8] From May to November 1850, Yang once again claimed to be deaf and mute.[9] Once he recovered, Yang alleged that God was angered that Hong Xiuquan was not being allowed to establish the kingdom of God on Earth and sought to punish mankind with disease.[10] According to this tale, only by suffering his illness was Yang able to redeem others.[11] In 1850, perhaps in service of his political ambitions, he began to claim that he could miraculously heal true believers.
Taiping Rebellion
editHe was an early participant in the rebellion and rose quickly to prominence; in 1851, when Hong Xiuquan took the title of Heavenly King for himself, he made Yang, in spite of having no military knowledge or experience, commander-in-chief of the army. Yang was further named "East King" as one of the five kings. In 1851, Yang announced a vision in which it was revealed that there were traitors in the highest levels of the movement, and two years later that words of the Eastern King, that is, Yang himself, were divine. He devised an extensive network of spies to root out the intrigues of loyalists in the kingdom. Shrewd, ruthless, and ambitious, Yang ultimately proved himself to be a brilliant strategist and organizer, as well as the administrative mastermind of the Taiping Movement.[12] By the 1850s, Yang had become the most powerful leader of the Taiping Rebellion.[13]
With this presumed divine guidance, Taiping troops captured the city of Nanjing (Nanking), which became the capital of the Heavenly Kingdom in 1853. Yang took control of the city. He disciplined the troops after an initial period of violence and slaughter by declaring that he would execute any officer who entered a private home. City residents were ordered to return to work. Men and women were required to live separately, and were prohibited from walking together or even speaking to each other (there continued to be male and female military units). As Hong, the Heavenly King, became less interested in politics and more interested in his harem, he named Yang as prime minister of the Heavenly Kingdom. Many of the basic laws and regulations were issued during this period of Yang's control.[14]
In August 1856, Yang defeated the government troops besieging Nanking. He first led them to divide their forces by forcing them to send relief forces to other cities, then sent all his own troops against them in a massed attack. Arrogance over victory, however, led to his downfall.[15] Yang clashed with Hong over the rebellion's policies and views toward Confucianism and iconoclasm; Yang believed that Confucian morality was essentially positive, and that its basic tenets were compatible with the rebellion's interpretation of Christianity. He believed that images of dragons were not sacrilegious. Hong, however, rejected this notion and believed that Confucianism ought to be eradicated (considering the belief system to be the work of the devil), and that dragons represent the devil.
Fall
editYang plotted to take the throne. Shortly before seeking a title equivalent to Hong Xiuquan's, Yang dispatched Wei Changhui, Shi Dakai, and Qin Rigang to separate provinces.[16] Hong, viewing Yang's request as treasonous, alerted the three generals to return at once.[16] Meanwhile, Yang demanded to be called Wansui (Ten Thousand Years), a title reserved for the emperor (Hong had assumed it in 1852). Wei returned to Nanjing with three thousand troops on September 1, 1856, and found that Qin Rigang had already arrived.[17] In consultation with Hong Xiuquan and his allies, the two generals decided not to wait for Shi Dakai's arrival.[17] Instead, they and their troops immediately stormed Yang's palace and slew him before he could escape.[17] They then slaughtered his family and followers within the palace, despite having agreed with Hong that only Yang was to die.[17] At this point, six thousand of Yang's followers remained in Nanjing.[18] Yang's remaining followers in the capital were all systemically slaughtered over the next three months.[19] Within a few years, the fortunes of the Taiping Rebellion declined as the rebellion's leaders became involved in the ensuing conspiracies and intrigues.[20]
Notes
edit- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 35 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 35-36 (1966)
- ^ Chin, Shunshin (2001). Taiping Rebellion. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-1953-2.
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 36 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 36 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 36 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 36-37 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 37 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 38 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 39 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 39 (1966)
- ^ Franz H. Michael, The Taiping Rebellion: History 35, 190 (1966)
- ^ Teng in Eminent Chinese, p. 886-87.
- ^ Teng in Eminent Chinese, p. 887.
- ^ Teng in Eminent Chinese, p. 887.
- ^ a b Jonathan D. Spence, God's Chinese Son 237 (1996)
- ^ a b c d Jonathan D. Spence, God's Chinese Son 242 (1996)
- ^ Jonathan D. Spence, God's Chinese Son 242-43 (1996)
- ^ Jonathan D. Spence, God's Chinese Son 243-44 (1996)
- ^ Teng in Eminent Chinese, p. 887.
Further references
edit- Teng, Ssu-yu (1943). Hummel, Arthur W. Sr. (ed.). Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period. Vol. II. United States Government Printing Office. pp. 886–888. . In