This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion
I suggest that we keep listing the women which were nominated for DYK for March but didn't make it to a March appearance, when they appear in April, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oh that sounds like a good idea, but lets not forget to thank all the contributors. It looks like a record making month. I wonder did anyone notice the change in male:female ratio who didn't know it was happening? Victuallers (talk) 15:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, really great, I'm so proud and inspired! I had to host my WikiWomen's event yesterday, April 5. I'm torn about adding our successes to this page or that might not be fair. What do you all think? If no, that's no big deal too, since they were all improved or written on April 5, not March 5 :) SarahStierch (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Being bold, being impatient, and in anticipation of March/Women's History Month, I created several women's biographies in Feb and included them in the Outcomes list -- no one complained. So IMO, yesterday's edit-a-thon articles belong on the Outcomes page, too, as 2014's capstone. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
