Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Myanmar/Reliable sources
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Curiousdroid in topic Nomination 1
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Nomination 1
editThe following are all independently-published private medias and news agencies in Burma.
How should we consider their reliability?
- Option 1: The sources are recognized as being generally reliable.
- Option 2: There is no consensus or additional considerations apply.
- Option 3: The sources are recognized as being generally unreliable in most cases, though they can be used under certain circumstances.
- Option 4: The sources are recognized as being not reliable at all and should be deprecated. Htanaungg (talk) 16:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Vote
edit- Option 2 These are major media in Myanmar and reliable in some case but not military related reports. Thanks Taung Tan (talk) 05:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Option 2 It depends on their "conflict of interest." They are generally unreliable on cases pertaining to the anti-junta movement. I have read articles that are certainly a part of coordinated psychological warfare against the junta. However, they can be cited for more general news. Curiousdroid (talk) 07:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Curiousdroid, it should be Option 2 then. Except current situation related to junta, they could be used as RS. Htanaungg (talk) 08:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. Cool. I changed it. Also, they can be used as an additional source if other, more reliable sources agree. Curiousdroid (talk) 08:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Curiousdroid, it should be Option 2 then. Except current situation related to junta, they could be used as RS. Htanaungg (talk) 08:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)