Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration was copied or moved into Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Move?
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Pages moved. Ucucha 23:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce → Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce —, and suggested moves of several related pages. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Discussion copied from User talk:Anthony Appleyard
edit- Hi, thanks for taking a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce. I'm not sure what to do with that and some related pages. I was looking at the histmerge largely because of there being a talk page on Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration with useful information, which is the main issue I had with doing a simple redirect. Also the "Taskforce" name isn't descriptive. Would
- Moving Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce to Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce
- Moving Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illustration to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce/Archive 1
- Redirecting Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration (and its talk) to Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce
- Starting the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration task force with a {{copied}} template for the WP:Illustration copy.
- Merging/redirecting Wikipedia:WikiProject SVG (after a discussion on related pages or via MFD) to the Illustration task force.
- sound like an ok solution to you? I know there's several discussions need to take place, but I recently updated Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Wikipedia#Files and its a mish mash of overlapping projects there. -Optigan13 (talk) 23:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- I could not perform the history-merge requested because the first 33 edits of Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration are WP:Parallel versions; the move from Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce to Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration was not a plain cut-and-paste move but a textmerge. See WP:Parallel versions. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Continued discussion
edit- Comment the current name is quite weird... an anonymously named taskforce... 70.29.210.242 (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The featured-article candidate Shapley-Folkman lemma would benefit from a review of its illustrations. The article has 3 supports and no opposes; the supports did not discuss the illustrations. A FA-specialist editor asked for a review of the illustrations.
There are two new images for the page, as well as an animation.
Thank you! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- All I can say about its illustrations is that "I am impressed". Excellent. Fleet Command (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, FleetCommand!
- I should note that User:Quaddell kindly reviewed the images, as part of the FA nomination.
- Most of the images come from other articles, but the two best were custom-contributed by User:David Eppstein, whose image galleries awaken the "inner mathematician/artist" in each of us. :D
- Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ouch! These pictures' placement really disfigure this section of talk page, at least on my screen. So, I moved them to the bottom. But in the process I noticed a problem: The alt text is very long. Remember: Alt text is a mean of accessibility. It is for those who cannot see the image and must hear it. So, alt text should not be similar to caption; otherwise, the visually-impaired people will just hear the same text twice. It is a torture for those poor folks. Make sure alt text is something like "illustration" or a short summary. Read help documentations for more info. Fleet Command (talk) 11:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
-
The Shapley–Folkman lemma is illustrated by the Minkowski addition of four sets. The point (+) in the convex hull of the Minkowski sum of the four non-convex sets (right) is the sum of four points (+) from the (left-hand) sets—two points in two non-convex sets plus two points in the convex hulls of two sets. The convex hulls are shaded pink. The original sets each have exactly two points (shown as red dots).
-
The circumradius (blue) and inner radius (green) of a point set (dark red, with its convex hull shown as the lighter red dashed lines). The inner radius is smaller than the circumradius except for subsets of a single circle, for which they are equal.
Pencil Manufacture
editFor Pencil#Manufacture, please make animation of pencil manufacture using http://i.imgur.com/788bA.gif as example. Thanks! -- Utmoatr (talk) 11:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Trolley problem could use some pictures to illustrate the different variations of the problem, if anyone is interested in creating them. —Granger (talk · contribs) 19:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Annotated image policy
editIf anyone has an interest in interactive annotated images, I've made a post on WP:IUP to discuss when wikilinked image annotation is appropriate. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 02:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Image optimization challenge
editThink you are good at image editing? I have a challenge for you. See File talk:500 x 500 SMPTE Color Bars.png#Challenge. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)