Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Science and academia

Good article reassessment for Marian Breland Bailey

edit

Marian Breland Bailey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 10:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:Elisabeth Burgos-Debray#Requested move 5 March 2024

edit
 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Elisabeth Burgos-Debray#Requested move 5 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 12:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lists of publications: advice

edit

I've looked through the older discussions on how to approach bibliographic sections ([1] [2]), it appears that there's no hard policy on this topic (I couldn't find one), so I'd ask for some advice here. A useful thing I've noticed on German Wikipedia is that the editors take care to link the scans of books and articles if they're public domain or under a similar open license, e.g. de:August Leskien. Is this desirable on en.wp too? I've done that at Vatroslav Jagić and Atanasije Stojković (the latter having a mixture of fictional and scientific content). In the former article I also regularly included translations of the work-titles in brackets, as the scholar barely published in English, although I'm not sure if such data is truly needed (whoever knows the language and would wish to find and read the original book can understand the title anyway), and it might take up too much space. What is the best approach here? — Phazd (talk|contribs) 00:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dr. Catherine Emihovich

edit

Hello everybody!

I recently have been edited the page on Catherine Emihovich all by myself. Any help would be appreciated as I don't have much experience with wikipedia. If you were wondering she was the 12th Dean at the University of florida. I went to their talk page but it shut down. Once again anything is appreciated. Shane emihovich (talk) 19:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Shane emihovich, this page doesn't seem very active, you could ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red as they are usually helpful with editing women's biography articles. Also your username suggests that you may have a conflict of interest in editing the article, there is already some advice about this on your talk page. TSventon (talk) 15:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:Jason Baumgartner#Requested move 16 April 2024

edit
 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Jason Baumgartner#Requested move 16 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:José Mariano de Conceição Vellozo#Requested move 28 April 2024

edit
 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:José Mariano de Conceição Vellozo#Requested move 28 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Draft article about Cyril deGrasse Tyson

edit

  You are invited to help improve Draft:Cyril deGrasse Tyson, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. ––FormalDude (talk) 08:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Jerzy Linderski

edit

Re the long list of students in this article, unsourced or sourced to primary sources via external links. Wondering whether this should be deleted. Is there guidance on details of students? Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 09:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Now speedied. Tacyarg (talk) 21:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Mariapaola D'Imperio

edit

Would someone mind taking a look at Mariapaola D'Imperio and assessing it per WP:NPROF? There are only two primary-like sources currently being cited in support of article content, but one of them includes a list of publictions that might show the subject meets NPROF. The subject of the article has also recently started to edit it; so far, most of those edits seem to be fairly innoculous and made in good faith, but they might try to do some more. I did some minor reorganizing and hid some content per WP:BLPSOURCES, but it's probably better if someone more familair with articles about academics take a closer look at it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reorganizing Infobox Academic

edit

We're discussing whether and how to reorganize the fields in {{Infobox academic}}. Please feel free to join in the discussion here. — hike395 (talk) 20:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Carl Tanzler

edit

Carl Tanzler has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply