Wikipedia talk:Proposed article splits
Until –and if– a "Split Project" is formed, split requests will fall under the auspices of WikiProject Merge |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Proposed article splits page. |
|
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move 21 October 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Proposed article splits → Wikipedia:Proposed splits – The proposed name ("Proposed splits") is more concise and would be consistent with Wikipedia:Proposed mergers. — Newslinger talk 22:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. OhKayeSierra (talk) 02:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – if anything, Wikipedia:Proposed mergers should be moved to Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Very odd page
editThis is an odd page. What happened to WP:Bold? Not a mention of it. Why not? BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
proper protocol
editA proposed split was signed on 31 May 2024, but a proposed merger had been dated one day prior. So shouldn't discussion in the later proposed split wait until the earlier proposed merger reaches consensus? rootsmusic (talk) 20:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)