Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/USS Varuna (1861)

« Return to A-Class review list

Instructions for nominators and reviewers

Nominator(s): Hog Farm (talk)

USS Varuna (1861) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My first nomination here since I nominated CSS General Earl Van Dorn back in May. Varuna was being constructed as a merchant ship when the US military bought the unfinished vessel for use on the blockade during the war. At the Battle of Forts Jackson and St. Philip, Varuna got ahead of the other Union ships and was involved in a bloody fight with Governor Moore, a gunboat operated by the state of Louisiana. Governor Moore rammed Varuna twice, and a third blow from another Confederate vessel (sources disagree as to which one) was enough to sink her. Clive Cussler found her remains in the 1980s, by then mostly under the riverbank. Hog Farm Talk 03:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support by Nick-D

edit

I'd like to offer the following comments:

  • The lead seems a bit short - a couple of paras would be better given the length of the article
  • "against Confederate positions at Fort Jackson and Fort St. Philip " - I'd suggest saying where these forts were located
  • Was the design of the ship altered after the USN bought it? (presumably yes, to add weapons and facilities for the crew, etc)
    • @Nick-D: - I haven't seen a source that says much about this. Charles Swasey, one of the ship's officers, wrote in his post-battle report Here let me pause for a moment while we reflect upon the inadaptedness of a merchant-built vessel for war purposes, particularly such as the Varuna was called upon to take part in. Had we been built with that strength which all the other vessels possessed, and the need of which becomes more apparent to the mind of the naval officer each day, we would yet be afloat off the city of New Orleans. So whatever they did evidently didn't work very well. Hog Farm Talk 03:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'm not sure what the literature on the USN of this era looks like, but are there reference books on ship types that would provide this? For 20th Century ships there's a vast specialist literature that provides these types of details, sometimes at obsessive levels of detail. Nick-D (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Parsecboy and Sturmvogel 66: - Are either of y'all aware of a good source for such information? The two reference-type books that come to my mind for this period are Silverstone (who doesn't have much for Varuna) and then Canney's The Old Steam Navy which is mostly focused on the purpose-built ships rather than the civilian conversions. Canney's work on the Confederate navy has this sort of details for the civilian conversions, though. Hog Farm Talk 03:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The crew of Varuna burned barrels of pork in an attempt to raise steam" - was this instead of burning coal in the boilers?
    • I've clarified that this was to raise additional steam - there's not much to work with in the source, but I think the implication is that they're throwing in whatever will burn hot. Hog Farm Talk 03:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • I’m reading Greene’s & Massignani’s Ironclads at War (for fun, my wife makes fun of me for my reading choices) and I came across this quote from Ramsay, the acting engineer aboard Virginia: "we…heaped quick burning combustibles into the already raging fires and brought the boilers to a pressure that would have been unsafe under ordinary circumstances—we piled in oiled cotton waste, splints of wood, anything that would burn faster than coal…" So it seems this was something of a known practice to increase power to the engine. Dunno if it’s useful beyond as an explanation here on the review page, but I remembered this comment when I read it. Parsecboy (talk) 22:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • A map of the area where the ship's final battle took place would be useful Nick-D (talk) 03:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support My comments are now addressed - great work with this article. Nick-D (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Parsecboy

edit

Image review:

@Parsecboy, do you have any further comments as part of the image review? If not, is this review a pass or fail? Matarisvan (talk) 09:51, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, we're good to proceed. Parsecboy (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

General comments:

  • I may have missed it, but I thought the DMY style for American military articles was for 20th century topics - not a huge deal (and I'm an American who prefers that style) but I was surprised to see it
  • This is a little nitpicky, but I don't generally use the "Out of service" field if the same date is in the Fate field directly below - seems redundant to me
  • "January or early February, 1861" - I think you don't need a comma there
  • Dunno how nitpicky we want to be, but 8 inches is 20.3cm
  • "The lead Union ship was USS Cayuga, who" - think you mean "which"?
  • On that note, what type of ship was Cayuga? Ditto for Oneida further down
    • I've added this, although it requires another citation to Silverstone. I've added a hidden comment to explain why these seemingly unrelated pages of Silverstone are being cited. Hog Farm Talk 02:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another minor nitpick, but I'd invert the order of the images in the sinking section, so it shows ramming first, and then sinking.
    • Parsecboy - I've actually removed the sinking image to make room for a map of part of the action with Governor Moore. Hog Farm Talk 03:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's a shame there isn't more room - there's also a pretty nice illustration of Governor Moore shooting through its own hull on page 448 of the magazine the ramming image is from. Might be worth moving the illustrations to a gallery? But this is just an idea, not mandatory.

Overall, very nice work! Parsecboy (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, happy to support. Parsecboy (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Support by Pendright

edit

Placeholder - Pendright (talk) 01:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • One of the vessels purchased was Varuna, who was still under construction when the sale occurred on 31 December 1861.
The pronoun who is primarily used to refer to people
Another editor has already made the switch to "which". Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • During the action, Varuna ran ahead of the other Union ships, and was engaged in a chase with the Louisiana gunboat Governor Moore.
  • Add ensuing between the and action
  • Add she between and & was

Construction and characteristics

  • When the American Civil War broke out in April 1861 the Union adopted the Anaconda Plan.
Add a comma after 1861 - it's an introductory phrase
Added Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Many of the existing active ships were too large to enter the ports that would need to be blockaded.
Drop the second the - ports are not specific
Removed Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • She was a steamship[4] and was powered by a single screw propeller.
  • The lead refers to Varnua as a "screw steamer"?
  • She was powered by a "steam-engine" and propelled by a single screw, or driven by a single propeller.
Screw and propeller have the same meaning. Propellers
While most propeller are screw propellers, not all are. Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Info Box may need tweaking

Service History

  • Encountering three Confederate gunboats, Varuna fired at them, and continued upriver.[15]
Why the comma after them?
Removed. I was never adequately taught comma usage in school, so I admittedly just guess whether they are needed or not. Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Varuna was now the leading Union ship, and was spotted by the State of Louisiana gunboat Governor Moore.
and it was spott6e
Have gone with "she was spotted" for consistency in pronoun use with the rest of the article. Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The commander of Governor Moore ordered lights similar to those on Varuna displayed on his ship as a ruse.
Is the first on necessary?
I guess not. Removed. Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The gunboat CSS Jackson briefly fired into the melee, but then continued upriver to New Orleans.
but then it continue(d
As above, I've gone with "she" to keep the ship pronouns consistent. Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • At this point, the two ships were about 10 feet (3.0 m) apart, but could barely see each other due to dense smoke.[18]
but they could
Have gone with "their crews could" to avoid the somewhat awkwardness of implying that the ships themselves had sight. Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Governor Moore's deck,[18] but Governor Moore rammed Varuna, knocking out the Union ship's engines.
engines or engine?
The source here does refer to multiple engines. I'll look and see if I can find a source that gives a specific engine count. The reference to a single steam engine has been removed from the infobox. Hog Farm Talk 02:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hog Farm: Have you had any luck with your sources on whether the ship had a single-engine or multiple-engines? Pendright (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet - I'm away from my books and will be sporadically offline for the next several days. Hog Farm Talk 13:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hog Farm, 1.5 weeks have passed since your last comment above. Have you been able to address Pendright's last point on single or dual engines? Matarisvan (talk) 10:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was traveling for most of that time. This is on my to-do list. Hog Farm Talk 13:46, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Pendright and Matarisvan: - I've come up empty on anything authoritatively listing a number of engines. DANFS, Silverstone, Gaines, Chatelain, Hearn, and Browning are all silent on this. The volume of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies that deals with basic ship information includes engine specifications for some other vessels, but not for Varuna; that volume is one of the key historical sources for determining such information. Lytle's Merchant Steam Vessels of the United States contains nothing useful. Hog Farm Talk 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hog Farm: Do you have any suggestions? Pendright (talk) 05:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My personal instinct is to leave the number of engines undescribed in the text. Hog Farm Talk 05:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hog Farm: In the Info box, initially, it showed: Ship propulsion = *steam engine, singular, which you deleted. -> Who was the source for this? Pendright (talk) 06:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody added "steam engine" to the infobox years ago when this was still basically a stub, presumably on the basis of this being a steamship. The 1x steam engine part was further developed when I reformatted the infobox in March 2022 and apparently wasn't paying close enough attention. This apparently turned back into just "steam engine" at some point afterwards. I don't think there was ever really a specific source for this. Hog Farm Talk 04:17, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


This is it - Pendright (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pendright: Are all your concerns addressed? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:21, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hog Farm: I suspect you are as weary of this back and forth as I am, So let's find a way to mutually resolve the following issues. Pendright (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Info box

  • As you know, a ship's Info box shows readers how such ship is powered and propelled—yet how Varuna is powered is silent and this varies from the norm. Any ideas or suggestions?

Engines

  • I yield to your personal instinct to leave the number of engines undescribed in the text.

Last quibble

  • "She was a steamship[4] and was powered by a single screw propeller."
Steam powers the engine and it in turn rotates the screw propeller. Screw steamer Pendright (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's been an extremely hectic last several days at work for me, but I'll try to get something worked out with this over the weekend. Hog Farm Talk 02:59, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the Ping! Pendright (talk) 03:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Pendright: - Here's one idea of mine for at least partially solving this [1] - what are your thoughts about this as a solution? Hog Farm Talk 22:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hog Farm: Great, thanks! Supporting - Pendright (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - pass

edit
  • The article is consistently referenced with an appropriate citation style, and all claims are verifiable against reputable sources, accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations as appropriate.
  • Spot checks: 12, 13, 24, 25 - okay

All good. Passing. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]