Indiana articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
![]() |
6 | 9 | 14 | 29 | |||
![]() |
1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 13 | ||
![]() |
13 | 13 | |||||
![]() |
9 | 11 | 19 | 91 | 10 | 140 | |
B | 5 | 47 | 148 | 274 | 1 | 64 | 539 |
C | 4 | 54 | 200 | 1,039 | 292 | 1,589 | |
Start | 3 | 49 | 370 | 5,682 | 1,079 | 7,183 | |
Stub | 3 | 144 | 6,646 | 2 | 1,148 | 7,943 | |
List | 14 | 34 | 269 | 5 | 134 | 456 | |
Category | 5,333 | 5,333 | |||||
Disambig | 3 | 55 | 58 | ||||
File | 1 | 473 | 474 | ||||
Portal | 169 | 169 | |||||
Project | 66 | 66 | |||||
Redirect | 2 | 16 | 262 | 664 | 944 | ||
Template | 1 | 1 | 729 | 731 | |||
NA | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||||
Other | 3 | 18 | 21 | ||||
Assessed | 22 | 190 | 944 | 14,293 | 7,529 | 2,727 | 25,705 |
Unassessed | 8 | 302 | 310 | ||||
Total | 22 | 190 | 944 | 14,301 | 7,529 | 3,029 | 26,015 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 91,838 | Ω = 5.27 |
This is the WikiProject Indiana assessment summary page. See WP:1.0 and WP:WVWP for more information. For Indiana articles, see Category:Indiana. For Indiana stubs, see Category:Indiana stubs.
Instructions
editQuality assessments
editAn article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Indiana}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Indiana|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Indiana articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Indiana articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Indiana articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Indiana articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Indiana articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Indiana articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Indiana articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Indiana articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Indiana articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
The quality class should be assigned according to the Quality scale below.
Importance assessments
editAn article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Indiana}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Indiana articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Indiana articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Indiana articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Indiana articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Indiana articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Indiana articles) | ??? |
The importance should be assigned according to the Importance scale below.
Grading scheme
editQuality scale
editClass | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance scale
editDRAFT: WikiProject Indiana importance scale: The article's importance, regardless of its quality, particularly in terms of Indiana geography, history, demographics, cities and towns, law and government, economy, transportation, education, and professional sports.
Rate articles on overall importance. Use the basic descriptions, guided by the general examples when available. Always give the highest rating suggested by general examples at different levels.
Top | Subject is a must-have for Category:Indiana. A necessity for a print encyclopedia.
|
High | Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
|
Mid | Subject fills in more minor details
|
Low | Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial
|
Assessment log (updated by bot)
editJuly 24, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Mackenzie Wood (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Rob Holmberg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
July 23, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Chris Garten (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Edwardsville Formation (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Galesville Sandstone (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Mike Peluso (ice hockey, born 1965) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Rudolf Raff (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Spickert Knob Formation (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Wyandotte, Indiana (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- 10th National Eucharistic Congress (United States) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Mackenzie Wood (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Twin Branch Dam (Indiana) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
July 22, 2024
editReassessed
edit- FDIC International (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- James W. Dunbar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Notre Dame College of Arts and Letters (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Demographics of Indianapolis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Historic districts in Indiana by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:History of South Bend, Indiana (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Mayoral elections in Gary, Indiana (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
July 21, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Calvin Tankman (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Ironton Sandstone (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- WNTR (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- 1963 Indianapolis mayoral election (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Donald W. Zacharias (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- File:Floyd County Indiana Incorporated and Unincorporated areas New Albany Highlighted 1852326.svg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Historians from Indiana (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:History of Evansville, Indiana (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sports in Indiana by county (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
July 20, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Garfield (character) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Jordan Roos (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Mike Adams At His Honest Weight (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
July 19, 2024
editRenamed
editReassessed
edit- Johnston Lykins (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Garfield (character) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Toyota Material Handling (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
July 18, 2024
editAssessed
edit- 1983 Indianapolis mayoral election (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- A. J. Hawk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Chloë Farro (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)