Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 June 1

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< May 31 << May | June | Jul >> June 2 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 1

edit

06:21, 1 June 2023 review of submission by Khalilkhan bengali model1

edit

my page is not published till now why? Khalilkhan bengali model1 (talk) 06:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Khalilkhan bengali model1: sorry, but I don't understand what you're asking.
Let's assume you mean this sandbox draft (because that's pretty much the only edit from you, at least under this username): User:Khalilkhan bengali model1/sandbox.
Let's further assume you're asking why it hasn't been accepted for publication. That would be because you haven't yet submitted it for review.
Not that there is any point in submitting it, because it clearly isn't a viable article draft, as it has no real content (other than an image and a caption), no sources, and most importantly no indication of any notability. You also shouldn't be writing about yourself, as this is an encyclopaedia and not a social media platform.
Does that answer your question? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09:38, 1 June 2023 review of submission by ASTANASIA

edit

could you please rereview my page? thank you ASTANASIA (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ASTANASIA: Your draft was rejected, meaning there is no option to resubmit. This is because it is clear that the subject is not notable; as it states that they are a student with no other information or referencing. 09:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC) JML1148 (talk | contribs) 09:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. One unsourced line will never be accepted as an article. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. Please read the autobiography policy. Wikipedia wants to know what others say about you, not what you say about yourself. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10:57:44, 1 June 2023 review of submission by Sichere.Straßen

edit

We have updated the article and added more references to it. Is it possible to remove the banner from the top of the article? Sichere.Straßen (talk) 10:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sichere.Straßen: this draft was accepted back in 2020, and isn't therefore any longer an AfC matter. But to answer your question, maintenance tags can be removed by pretty much anyone, if they no longer apply or were incorrectly added in the first place. Meaning, if you are confident that the neutrality issue highlighted by this tag has been sufficiently addressed, you can remove the tag. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your fast response and sorry, that I have asked in the wrong group. I will try to remove it. Sichere.Straßen (talk) 13:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:27, 1 June 2023 review of submission by Tarz34

edit

Hey, friend, i tried ot make a draft about the YouTube animated series Asdfmovie. However, it was refused. I read the message and it said there were some issues. I wanted to know what these issues are, so I can improve the draft and resubmit. Tarz34 (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tarz34: the decline reasons are given in the decline notice on the draft page, those grey boxes inside the large pink box. In simple terms, the draft doesn't cite a single source, therefore none of the information can be verified, and there is also no evidence that the subject is notable. These are both core requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:34, 1 June 2023 review of submission by AHUSAO

edit

things we should remove to publish this or even modify AHUSAO (talk) 11:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing you can do, the draft was rejected. 331dot (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14:10, 1 June 2023 review of submission by Tarz34

edit

So friend, I finished putting the page references and sources. When i submited it, it said that i shouldn't put a Wikipedia page/article as a source. Tarz34 (talk) 14:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, now i edited the Wikipedia link source and I replaced it with another one, I just published the draft. I hope everything is ok. Also, why can't you cite Wikipedia pages as a reference? Tarz34 (talk) 14:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tarz34: Because wikipedia is user contributed with no editorial oversight. You can of course link to wikipedia article. YouTube is also not a reliable source to verify the notability of a person. You should review the following two pages: Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Identifying and using independent sources. Without such sources your draft will be declined again. The article needs to tell us what published third-party independent sources say about the subject. ww2censor (talk) 14:36, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:CIRCULAR. It would be like using one part of the Encyclopedia Britannica to cite another part. Wikipedia articles should be summarizing what independent reliable sources say. 331dot (talk) 14:37, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:05, 1 June 2023 review of submission by Gnklaus

edit

Why is the page denied? For what reason? Gnklaus (talk) 17:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gnklaus: because there is no indication, let alone evidence, that the subject is notable. This is an encyclopaedia, not a social media platform where anyone can 'post' whatever they want. We only accept articles on subjects that have been extensively covered in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. :) The personality I have posted is not as rising as most stars. But we see that quite a few personalities like footballers are not so popular but have their own Wikipedia page. But I totally understand what you're trying to tell me. Please apologize for the inconvenience and if possible yes delete the page and our Wiki Account. Thank you for your cooperation! Gnklaus (talk) 17:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draft deleted as requested. Can't do anything about your user account, you can just abandon that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gnklaus Popularity does not determine if someone merits a Wikipedia article(the preferred term, not "page"). Articles are not for the subject, but about the subject. Only coverage in independent reliable sources determines if someone merits an article. 331dot (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18:46, 1 June 2023 review of submission by 136.62.249.139

edit

The user who made this account was hired to do so but no longer uses this account and the subsequent edits have been made by a member of the VoxPop team who has now moved so the IP is different. Is there any way we can get this page deleted? 136.62.249.139 (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts are automatically marked for deletion after six months of inactivity. Is there a particular need for a speedier deletion? 331dot (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, there was some changes to the name among other things and we wanted a fresh start to be able to work on it. 136.62.249.139 (talk) 22:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please tell what else has changed other than the name. You will need to show with significant coverage in independent reliable sources that the company meets the Special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Give your three, and only three, best sources with significant coverage of the company and that describe what makes it important/significant/influential as the sources see it, not as the company sees it. If the sources are there, we can reopen the draft for resubmission.
You will also need to declare as a paid editor, as I assume "we" means you are a representative of the company. It is easier to declare if you create an account, but either way, you must disclose. See WP:PAID, as well as WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 23:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20:39, 1 June 2023 review of submission by Rikipedia1

edit

ai_sponge has garnered over 100k subs and over three million views on various platforms. Countless popular media outlets have documented ai_sponge and you're calling it unnotable? Also, only about fifteen second after posting the page, you turned it down! There is no possible way you read it all in fifteen seconds. Obviously you need to do more research into the topic I am covering so you understand why it is indeed notable. One thing you can help me with though is figuring out how to change the title. I can't change it from Ai sponge to ai_sponge. Rikipedia1 (talk) 20:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. You did not provide a single independent reliable source with significant coverage of this YouTube channel, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notable web content. It isn't up to us to research your topic, you must show us. 331dot (talk) 20:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rikipedia, your draft is entirely unreferenced and therefore violates the core content policy of WP:Verifiability. The failure of your draft to comply with core content policies can easily be detected in less than 15 seconds. Cullen328 (talk) 20:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21:18, 1 June 2023 review of submission by Tarz34

edit

I want you to delete this draft Tarz34 (talk) 21:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope someone in the near future will make another better page on the same subject. Asdfmovie is one of the most famous and well-known series on the Internet, and it's kind of strange that there isn't an "OFFICIAL" article about the series. Tarz34 (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you submit it if you think it should be deleted? I can delete it as an author request if you so desire. The presence of a Wikipedia article does not confer any "official" status. 331dot (talk) 21:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23:49, 1 June 2023 review of submission by IrisSpine

edit

Hi there! I was asked to address the WP:COI on this article. But I don't know how to do that. Could I trouble someone to point me in the right direction? Thank you for your time! IrisSpine (talk) 23:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IrisSpine. Click on your red linked signature that leads to your currently empty user page. Type a full and complete conflict of interest disclosure there, and then click "Publish changes". Cullen328 (talk) 01:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_June_1&oldid=1158919937"