Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 May 29

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< May 28 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 30 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 29

edit

05:26:21, 29 May 2020 review of submission by Kary591995

edit

Hello everyone there is a channel on YouTube named as "Kdt cool games" it deals with the tutorial of how to play a certain game and it also include gameplay. Kary591995 (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kary591995: Wikipedia may not be used for any kind of advertising, promotion, or public relations. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05:50:06, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Cirinsusaki

edit


Hello, My article has been dismissed for the following reason : This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

I used Japanese sources, that I translated myself from Wikipedia and the sources shown in the Japanese page. Unfortunately except Japanese sources, there are no English sources on the Internet. Are Japanese sources not seen as "reliable sources"?

Thank you in advance, Cirinsusaki

Cirinsusaki (talk) 05:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cirinsusaki. Thank you for your translation efforts. It's fine to use Japanese-language sources. I've left a more detailed comment on the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:00:05, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 70.59.84.88

edit


70.59.84.88 (talk) 06:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


06:13:47, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 70.59.84.88

edit

can you please check my draft 70.59.84.88 (talk) 06:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop asking. This is the third time in two days that you asked about this draft. Note to other reviewers: based on this question and the draft's history I suspect the IP to be a sockpuppet of the User:Adam Naa-complex. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:26:41, 29 May 2020 review of submission by SONGEZO SA

edit


SONGEZO SA (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SONGEZO SA You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, not just declined, meaning that there is little to no chance that it can be improved enough to meet Wikipedia's standards. Please review the advice you were given by the reviewers. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:39:47, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Uros77

edit


Hi,

I would need help to get my draft reviewed. Im not sure if everything is okay and as it should be. I did everything I was suggested. Can you help me? :)

Uros77 (talk) 10:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Uros77: Thank you for disclosing your conflict of interest. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed for almost a week. The current backlog is about five weeks. So you can anticipate a review by early July. It is extremely difficult to write an acceptable article about a company that is still in business, especially one that is relatively small and is privately held. So it's unlikely that the draft will be published as an article. You may wish to consider alternative outlets that have different inclusion criteria. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:50:18, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Benedict2005

edit


Hello this is Benedict2005, and I am requesting help to deliver a message to the reviewers of wikipedia regarding my Draft Article "Baldivis Secondary college" I am a student who attends Baldivis Secondary College and have gathered as much information of the school to the draft article. Is it possible that because i attend there and have gathered as much information regarding the school to the article, that i also prove that my referencing are not just non-noteable and just passing mentions? I have gathered as much information regarding the college and im certain that there is no Bias, nor false information. Thank you. Benedict2005 (talk) 11:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequently accepted by Sulfurboy. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:27, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:39:08, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 87.238.210.51

edit


87.238.210.51 (talk) 12:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


14:05:59, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Saitoti Torome

edit


Saitoti Torome (talk) 14:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:56:56, 29 May 2020 review of draft by 1freedom

edit


Hallo, I want to create the english wikipedia site for filmdirector, acrtress Mo Asumang. She already has a german and frensh site. Since I do not see the site published yet I am not sure if I worked correct. Would you be so kind and give me a short feedback, thanx. Bye for now, 1freedom

1freedom (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1freedom. Draft:Mo Asumang has not yet been submitted for review, so it hasn't been reviewed. But if it were submitted as it now stands it would not be accepted. The draft does not cite any sources at all, and it does not in any way establish that Asumang is Notable. Please understand that Wikipedia uses the term "notable" in a special technical sense, follow the link for details. The most common way to establish a person's notability is to find and cite multiple (usually at least 3) independent professionally published reliable sources that discuss the person in some depth and detail. This means no blogs, no fan or personal sites, and nothing written by the person or her employer or buisness associates, or based on a press release. it also means that directory entries, and brief mentions in discussions of other matters, film credits without critical comment, and the like, are of no value in establishing notability. Please follow the blue links for details. Please find and add sources that are independent of Asumang, reliable, and discuss her in detail before submitting this for review.
Please understand that having an article on the German and French language editions of Wikipedia in no way qualifies a person for an article on the English-language edition -- the projects are separate, with different polices and customs. Nor can the other Wikipedia articles be used as sources, although sources cited in them can often be used. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:13, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@1freedom: (edit conflict) First of all, all different Wikipedia languages are different projects with their own set of rules, so the existence of an article in one project cannot be cited as an argument for the existence in another. For your draft:
  • It currently cites zero reliable sources and therefore fails the verifiability policy.
  • It makes excessive use of links. Please only link the important stuff where a link will be usefull for the reader
  • "brave" is WP:PUFFERY and doesn't belong in an encyclopedic article. We want to maintain a neutral point of view.
  • I have fixed the image transclusion for you. Here on enwiki, you use "File:" instead of "Datei:" and "thumb" instead of "mini". The latter ones are project-specific (here for the german wikipedia) while the former work global.
I am going to link you User:Ian.thomson/Howto, a guide on how to write articles that wont be declined, rejected or deleted. Since your draft is only one sentence so far, there isn't much to save. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:52:41, 29 May 2020 review of submission by Daimen Carter (Musician)

edit


Daimen Carter (Musician) (talk) 17:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my article was not approved. I need further help https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:Daimen_Carter_(Musician)

@Victorysriram: Assuming this is about Draft:Daimen Carter (Musician), blogs and forums are not reliable sources and stuff written by the subject or someone affilated with the subject also don't help to establish notability. Note that if you are affilated with the subject in anyway or are compensated or expect compensation for your edits there are some declarations to make. The latter would be a Terms of Use requirement. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:15:42, 29 May 2020 review of submission by 2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6

edit


2405:204:301D:AE95:E475:C90:CA0A:53A6 (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mission Jaihind , ?? India's leading newspaper

20:05:32, 29 May 2020 review of draft by Mtennysdotter

edit


Can someone please look over my https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Darren_Prince and give me some feedback? I feel stuck at what else to add.

Mtennysdotter (talk) 20:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_May_29&oldid=985276022"