Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 August 16
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 15 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 17 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
August 16
edit04:31:56, 16 August 2020 review of submission by Thenigeriansocialite
edit
Thenigeriansocialite (talk) 04:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Thenigeriansocialite: Please see Wikipedia:inline citations for how to format inline citations. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
07:49:45, 16 August 2020 review of submission by Violinwiki
edit- Violinwiki (talk · contribs)
I would like to check on the status of review for this page, as I noticed a message that the previous reviewer is going to be on break for sometime. If this is the case, is it possible to get this draft reassigned to someone else? Thank you! Violinwiki (talk) 07:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Violinwiki Your draft, as noted at the bottom, is pending review. It will be reviewed in due course by a volunteer, as the notice states, "This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,439 pending submissions waiting for review." 331dot (talk) 07:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
08:48:00, 16 August 2020 review of submission by Skkhanshabh
edit- Skkhanshabh (talk · contribs)
Skkhanshabh (talk) 08:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Skkhanshabh, It appears that you are not notable in our terms. Do you disagree? Fiddle Faddle 09:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
10:34:18, 16 August 2020 review of submission by CHURCHIL JERIN
editI would like to check on the status of review for this page, as I noticed a message that the previous reviewer is going to be on break for sometime. If this is the case, is it possible to get this draft reassigned to someone else? CHURCHIL JERIN (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Your draft was rejected, which means it will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 10:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
10:34:29, 16 August 2020 review of submission by Asifiqbal12
edit- Asifiqbal12 (talk · contribs)
asif (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
11:19:12, 16 August 2020 review of submission by 156.204.212.97
edit
156.204.212.97 (talk) 11:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not an ideal venue for announcing your birthday, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
14:11:12, 16 August 2020 review of draft by Memon KutianaWala
edit
Anna Higgs(this got approved in 2 days because i created the article direct and not used draft)
I am creating article since 2018 but usually i create direct and it gets approved but last 3 articles of mine which are in draft taking too much time. Can any editor look into this and move it to main space? all the articles are passing WP:GNG WP:BIO and on WP:NPOV
Memon KutianaWala (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Memon KutianaWala, You've been very lucky in the past. Please have patience in the present and the future Fiddle Faddle 15:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
15:15:10, 16 August 2020 review of submission by 216.174.74.201
edit
This article is worthy of inclusion based on the remoteness of the location and its architectural value, not to mention the relics that are stored in the church monastery.
216.174.74.201 (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
19:40:30, 16 August 2020 review of submission by Taiwanbro101
edit- Taiwanbro101 (talk · contribs)
I have included valid sources and more evidence of significance that can prove this person worthy of his own wikipedia page
Taiwanbro101 (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- We are not interested in another Seigenthaler. Every single claim requires a strong third-party source corroborating it. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 22:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
20:10:05, 16 August 2020 review of submission by Shsj7238380
edit- Shsj7238380 (talk · contribs)
Shsj7238380 (talk) 20:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
i want to have wikipedia page of my name fransisca sim as im just starting youtuber
please approve it
im still just starting and i doesnt do promotion i want have one wikipedia for people easy to know me immediately
please unblock @lienching19811
do not block me
wikipedia is for everyone
i never do promotion and is that false im just starting have own fransisca sim page as im just starting youtuber
i never do any promotion i want have a wikipedia personal fan page about me page for my social media look more official and more nice viewing my
profile , simple and elegantic
i want to have my own fransisca sim page for my links at youtube more official and known
please approve and publish my fransisca sim page no worry
please approve and publish at google search page wikipedia
thanks
please approve my page
- Shsj7238380 Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, and has no interest in enhancing search results for you. If you meet the special Wikipedia definition of notability, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources, someone will eventually take note of you and choose to write about you. Please see the autobiography policy. Also note that an article is not necessarily desirable. 331dot (talk) 20:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
22:03:03, 16 August 2020 review of submission by MateoZigo
edit
MateoZigo (talk) 22:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- MateoZigo You don't ask a question, but this is the English Wikipedia, contributions need to be in English. Even leaving that aside, you did not offer any independent reliable sources with significant coverage showing how this person meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. Please see your first article for more information. 331dot (talk) 22:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- MateoZigo, First it is written in German. Bad move for the English Language Wikipedia. Second, Wikipedia is not social media. So of course it was rejected Fiddle Faddle 22:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)