Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 June 16

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< June 15 << May | June | Jul >> June 17 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 16

edit

03:36:46, 16 June 2019 review of draft by Geoffmalc

edit


At 86 years old, I have been urged to create this page before it is too late and family knowledge of references is lost I have spent many hours trying to comply with your +requirements, re-formatting to keep it simple. I need to know what the continued problem is. The components of my draft are all verifiable. I hope my latest version, with appropriate reference numbers, is the one being scrutinised , not the early versions.. Geoffmalc (talk) 03:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiographies are strongly discouraged and your draft has no evidence that you are notable enough in Wikipedia terms, for an article I'm afraid. Theroadislong (talk) 08:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a message at your user talk, Geoffmalc. --valereee (talk) 11:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:51:17, 16 June 2019 review of submission by 1brianrichardsmith

edit


Hello, I would like a review. I think it's deserved to be on Wikipedia. Thank you. 1brianrichardsmith (talk) 05:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @1brianrichardsmith: Please take a look at our notability guidelines. Articles on Wikipedia need to be on subjects that have gained significant attention in reliable, independent sources. Examples of sources would be books, news articles, interviews by the media, etc. At this time that doesn't look to be the case for Brian Smith. If I can clarify anything about our notability guidelines, please let me know. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:07:49, 16 June 2019 review of draft by Kyle Riebe

edit


Kyle Riebe (talk) 07:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Riebe: - this draft both lacked any sources, and also reads as an essay - not a neutral encyclopedic article Nosebagbear (talk) 10:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:02:11, 16 June 2019 review of draft by Falconite007

edit


Help regarding citing same reference multiple times. How do I do it?

Falconite007 (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Falconite007: - excellent question.
If you're editing using the wiki-editor (you write in a box and there are some {{}}) then Ref Beginners "Using the same ref more than once" does a reasonable job at explaining
If you're using the Visual Editor (it looks more like word when you edit, with no {{}} anywhere), then Visual Editor - reusing refs is the place to go.
Good hunting! Nosebagbear (talk) 10:41, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:16:28, 16 June 2019 review of submission by 2600:1009:B060:14F8:8DCE:FD92:E9FD:8EEF

edit


CAN SOMEONE PLEASE CONTACT ME BACK WITH ASSISTANCE?? i HAVE RESUBMITTED THIS ARTICLE THREE TIMES AND IT STILL ISN'T BEING APPROVED. WHAT EXACTLY DO I HAVE TO DO TO CHANGE IT TO BE APPROVED? DO I HAVE TO CHANGE THE TONE? DO I NEED TO FIX ANY CITATIONS? CAN I TALK TO A HUMAN BEING?? PLEASE?

THIS ARTICLE IS ONLY PER A CELEBRITY CHEF THAT WANTS TO HAVE AN ONLINE SOURCE FOR HIS ACHIEVEMENTS AND RECOGNITION. I AM REQUESTING STEP BY STEP DIRECTION ON HOW TO DO THIS AND MAKE IT APPROPRIATE TO BE APPROVED.

SOMEONE PLEASE GET BACK TO ME ON THIS!!

2600:1009:B060:14F8:8DCE:FD92:E9FD:8EEF (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No need to SHOUT. The first 9 sources do not even mention Boccuzzi, all content needs to be supported by a source that confirms the content. Theroadislong (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:13:02, 16 June 2019 review of submission by Lawagstaff2

edit


Lawagstaff2 (talk) 14:13, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This does not appear to be a notable person Devokewater (talk) 15:14, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:57:24, 16 June 2019 review of submission by Falconite007

edit


I have already submitted a draft (written in sandbox) which is pending review. Can I submit another draft now? When I go to my sandbox, I see the contents of the previous draft. I'm afraid if I clear the sandbox, the submitted draft ill get deleted.

Falconite007 (talk) 14:57, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Falconite007 Greetings. I have moved the page to Draft space - see here Draft:Supernode Proof of Stake. Pls remove all external links from the content of the draft. Your sand box is cleared now and do use Wikipedia: Article Wizard to create your new draft. Do use the "horizontal" template for inline citation for web sources - see Template:Cite Web. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:06, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:01:06, 16 June 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Mbstet21

edit


I don't know why my Draft cannot be submitted and published. I've had an account for almost two months and have made more than 10 edits to the Jacob Hornberger article I am trying to publish. Thanks for your help.

Mbstet21 (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:46:55, 16 June 2019 review of draft by RecordAR

edit


Hello. Thank you for your assistance. I would like to revise this entry so that it is approved. This article is intended as an informational resource, not advertising or advocacy. CredibleMeds aims to inform consumers about potentially fatal drug interactions.

1. Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the U.S. CredibleMeds is a free resource that provides information about the potential for certain drug interactions to cause cardiac arrest and aims to reduce drug-induced heart failure. Is this too unbalanced as a Wikipedia article? Perhaps too specific by highlighting Torsades de pointes?

2. We used primarily scientific sources as our references. Would these sources help support the article's legitimacy? http://qtinformatics.com/crediblemeds/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272941081_CredibleMeds_Independent_information_on_medicines https://www.practicalpainmanagement.com/treatments/pharmacological/non-opioids/qt-intervals-antidepressants https://holisticprimarycare.net/topics/topics-h-n/holistech/1837-crediblemeds-new-private-public-collaboration-aims-to-reduce-inappropriate-antibiotic-use.html https://cpd.pharmacy.ubc.ca/sites/cpd.pharmacy.ubc.ca/files/uploads/Update_2016/DLi_WS4_Drug_Interact/CredibleMeds%20Filtered%20QTDrug%20List%20Feb%2021%2C%202016.pdf (Univ of British Columbia) https://www.sads.org/living-with-sads/Drugs-to-Avoid#.XQZzNY97nIU

3. Would it be better to combine this listing with its host? AZCERT maintains this resource. https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Arizona_Center_for_Education_and_Research_on_Therapeutics? AZCERT

Again, thank you for your assistance.

RecordAR (talk) 17:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)RecordAR[reply]

RecordAR (talk) 17:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RecordAR. Please clarify what you mean by "we". The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account". Usernames should not be shared by multiple individuals. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Worldbruce. I am the only user contributing to my account. However, my colleagues helped me to collect the reference material that I cited in the article (thus the "we"). RecordAR (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2019 (UTC)RecordAR[reply]

20:19:06, 16 June 2019 review of draft by JAP321

edit


JAP321 (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need to ask how could I add pictures to the articlesJAP321 (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JAP321 Greetings. The copyrighted party of image needs to be irrevocably agreed to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License before the image could be use in Wikipedia. See here for info at Wikipedia:Uploading images and you could upload the image at [Upload Wizard]. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_June_16&oldid=984855233"