Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 July 25
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < July 24 | << Jun | July | Aug >> | July 26 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
July 25
edit05:39:25, 25 July 2015 review of submission by Hussaindx
edit
Hussaindx (talk) 05:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Hussaindx: Being charitable I would say you had finger trouble in both creating the test edit and submitting it for review. What I wonder is why you have then asked for help here, albeit without asking a question. This is not an article, was not worthy of submission, and has been
Declined as a test. So why, please, are you here, at this help desk, with some sort of question? Fiddle Faddle 07:46, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Werdna Yrneh Yarg (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Werdna Yrneh Yarg (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)AndrewWerdna Yrneh Yarg (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your message and so promptly; I never intended that article to be inserted on the River Cober page, but simply on a talk page upon which others could post their views. I am aware that the substance therein would have not only to be suitably cited, but precised to one sentence! There was no more substance in it than that.
Kind Regards, Werdna Yrneh Yarg (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)AndrewWerdna Yrneh Yarg (talk) 08:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
09:29:53, 25 July 2015 review of submission by Frankyjb59
edit- Frankyjb59 (talk · contribs)
The page edit was rejected, although i reason was given, i didn't understand it. Could i have clarification please?
Frankyjb59 (talk) 09:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Frankyjb59: A lot of things exist. Most of them are not suitable topics for an encyclopedia. Producing anthologies, exhibiting, and reading on local community radio does not mean that an organization merits a stand alone article in Wikipedia. If those activities are analyzed in depth in multiple, reliable, secondary sources, independent of the organization and of others involved in promoting the activities, then that would demonstrate notability. Think PhD theses, academic journal articles, or substantial profiles in national/regional newspapers or broadcast media. Worldbruce (talk) 01:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
16:54:01, 25 July 2015 review of submission by Matt Farag
edit- Matt Farag (talk · contribs)
Matt Farag (talk) 16:54, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
20:43:43, 25 July 2015 review of submission by Audrija1990
edit- Audrija1990 (talk · contribs)
Why was the article rejected? It had all the basic information needed for a growing actress. And most importantly she didnt have an article written for herself previously. Please notify me where I ha made mistakes. Audrija1990 (talk) 20:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Why it was rejected is unimportant, It has been Declined today by me as a copyright violation. Fiddle Faddle 13:13, 26 July 2015 (UTC)